A neutron star collapses - where's pauli?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the collapse of neutron stars and the implications of quantum mechanics, particularly the role of fermions and degeneracy pressure. Participants explore the nature of matter in neutron stars, the transition to black holes, and the need for a quantum theory of gravity to fully understand these phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that neutrons, being fermions, cannot occupy the same quantum state, raising questions about how a neutron star can collapse if it is already in a degenerate state.
  • Others argue that degeneracy pressure is what prevents the neutron star from collapsing, suggesting that only a sufficient mass can overcome this pressure and lead to black hole formation.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the fate of matter during the collapse of a neutron star into a black hole, indicating a need for a quantum theory of gravity to understand this process.
  • Some participants challenge the simplistic view of neutron stars as merely collections of neutrons, proposing that at extreme densities, the core may consist of a quark-gluon plasma, which complicates the understanding of black hole formation.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of quarks and their interactions, with one participant questioning the visibility of neutron stars compared to black holes and whether a neutron star could be invisible while exerting significant gravitational influence.
  • References to lattice QCD and recent advancements in determining quark masses are mentioned, suggesting ongoing research into the properties of quark matter and its implications for understanding neutron stars and potential quark stars.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of neutron stars, the mechanisms of their collapse, and the understanding of quark matter. The discussion remains unresolved with various hypotheses presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current understanding, particularly regarding the transition from neutron stars to black holes and the role of quantum gravity and quark matter. There are unresolved questions about the nature of matter under extreme conditions and the implications for theoretical models.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying astrophysics, quantum mechanics, and particle physics, particularly in the context of neutron stars, black holes, and the fundamental nature of matter.

fargoth
Messages
318
Reaction score
6
neutrons are fermions, with half spin, as such the must not occupy the same quantum state (meaning the wave functions can't overlap - atleast not with a big probability density portion of each other).
so, if neutron star is in the most dense state it can get, meaning its degenerate and every level is taken - how can it collapse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That degeneracy pressure is what keeps the neutron star from collapsing in the first place. Only if there is enough mass to overcome this degeneracy pressure does the star collapse into a black hole.
 
What happens to the matter when a neutron star collapses to become a black hole? Nobody really knows. I think that's why we need a quantum theory of gravity.
 
fargoth said:
neutrons are fermions, with half spin, as such the must not occupy the same quantum state (meaning the wave functions can't overlap - atleast not with a big probability density portion of each other).
so, if neutron star is in the most dense state it can get, meaning its degenerate and every level is taken - how can it collapse?
It is very naive to just picture a neutron star as a huge stack of neutrons. This is a semi-classical point of view. Neutrons are not fundamental particles : at the energies, pressures, density scales involved in neutrons stars, the intermost layers (the core) of the star must be a real soup of mesons and quarks (quark and gluon plasma, if such a thing exists). My point is the following : sure before we can claim to understand black hole formation, we need quantum gravity. Yet even before we have that at disposal, we need to understand quark matter.

(Now I'm waiting for Kea who will claim we cannot understand QCD (and especially the mass gap and confinement) before we reach quantum gravity theory tools :rolleyes:)
 
i thought when a red quark is coupled with blue and green quarks they disable each other's fields almost complitely...
and even if this is like a crystal made of quarks.. it takes-up a deffinite space, quarks have half spin too, and they can't exist at the same place.
ok, so the bottom line is no one knows... is there any proof that neutron stars collapse? i mean, what's the diffrence between a massive neutron star and a black hole when we watch them? can't a neutron star be invisible and have lots of gravity?
 
I Must Say That Your Questions Was Genuinely A Beautiful One, Fargoth...it Has Start Me Thinking Too... :)
 
humanino said:
It is very naive to just picture a neutron star as a huge stack of neutrons. This is a semi-classical point of view. Neutrons are not fundamental particles : at the energies, pressures, density scales involved in neutrons stars, the intermost layers (the core) of the star must be a real soup of mesons and quarks (quark and gluon plasma, if such a thing exists). My point is the following : sure before we can claim to understand black hole formation, we need quantum gravity. Yet even before we have that at disposal, we need to understand quark matter.

(Now I'm waiting for Kea who will claim we cannot understand QCD (and especially the mass gap and confinement) before we reach quantum gravity theory tools :rolleyes:)

Lattice QCD seems to get really rolling now.

A new determination of light quark masses:
http://latticeqcd.blogspot.com/2005/11/new-determination-of-light-quark.html

Most Precise Mass Calculation For Lattice QCD:
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2005/split/731-1.html

So, We probably may see this work extended in the not to far away
future to hypothetical "Quark-stars" or other interesting objects.


Regards, Hans
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K