A particle in a spherical symmetric potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle constrained in a spherically symmetric potential, specifically examining the implications of the potential's boundary conditions on the wave function. The potential is defined as V(r)=0 for r=r_0, where r_0 is a positive constant. Participants explore the behavior of the wave function at the boundaries and its implications for finding the ground state energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss why the wave function must vanish at r=r_0, questioning the physical implications of an infinite potential. They explore the necessity of boundary conditions on the radial wave function and how these conditions restrict the form of possible wave functions. There is also discussion about the relationship between the wave function and the Schrödinger equation in the context of the potential well.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the reasoning behind the boundary conditions and the implications of the infinite potential on the wave function. There is an ongoing exploration of how to express the ground state function and the conditions required to satisfy the Schrödinger equation within the defined potential. Multiple interpretations of the wave function's behavior are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints imposed by the potential's definition, particularly the requirement that the wave function must vanish at the boundary where the potential becomes infinite. There is also a focus on the implications of these constraints for determining the ground state energy.

noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle that moves in three dimensions is trapped in a deep spherically symmetric potential V(r):

V(r)=0 at r<r_0

infinity at r>= r_0

where r_0 is a positive constant. The ground state wave function is spherically symmetric , so the radial wave function u(r) satistifies the 1-dimensional Schrödinger energy eigenvalue equation (-[tex]\hbar[/tex]2/2m)*d^2/dr^2*u(r)+V(r)*u(r)=Eu(r) with the boundary condition u(0)=0 (eqn u(r)=r*phi(r)

a) Explain why, in the potential well in the equation V(r)=0 at r<r_0

infinity at r>= r_0, the wave function is forced to vanish at r=r_0

b) Using the known boundary conditions on the radial wave function u(r) at r=0 and r=r_0 , find the ground state energy of the particle of this potential well

Homework Equations



(-[tex]\hbar[/tex]2/2m)*d^2/dr^2*u(r)+V(r)*u(r)=Eu(r)
u(r)=r*phi(r)


The Attempt at a Solution



a)I don't exactly know what they mean by vanish in this context. Does V vanish when V=0? I know in a classically allowed region, when a particle just sits in a well and there is no external energy being transferred to the particle, then V=0.

b) To begin this problem, I should probably plug u(r) into (-[tex]\hbar[/tex]2/2m)*d^2/dr^2*u(r)+V(r)*u(r)=Eu(r). Not sure how following this procedure will help me find the value for the ground state energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For A), the question is why the wavefunction must vanish (the angular parts are irrelevant; only u(r) really need vanish) at r=r0 where the potential jumps to be unboundedly large. The wavefunction does not "seep into" the region of infinite potential. The reason this must be can be seen in Schroedinger's equation: What happens when we try to put in V=infinity? What would d^2/dr^2*u or E have to be to satisfy the equation, and why would this be physically ruled out? On the other hand, if we just demand u=0 starting at r0, then the equation does not even need to be solved in a non-trivial way...it is trivially solved already.
For B), this kind of reasoning is similar in many 1-dimensional problems. First think of just the well region where V=0. Then in that region you'd get free particle plane waves as solutions to the equation. But of course the particle isn't free because the V=0 region is not all there is to this particle's world; it sees the V=infinity jump. But we know that the conditions on the function u(r) are: u(r=0)=0=u(r=r0). So that just restricts the types of wavefunctions u(r) can be: Not just any exp(ikr) type plane wave, but a subset of them...what type of waveforms? Remember that the waveform you write down must be chosen so that the boundary conditions u(r=0)=0=u(r=r0) could be satisfied. You will also have to write down conditions on k such that the conditions are satisfied, just like in other 1-dimensional problems.

What is the ground state function, u(r), then? (Hint: note that we can write k in terms of known quantities). Putting u(r) in the Schr. eqn for the region r=[0,r0] will give you an eqn for E in terms of the mass, r0 and h-bar (Hint: What is V for this region?).
 
javierR said:
For A), the question is why the wavefunction must vanish (the angular parts are irrelevant; only u(r) really need vanish) at r=r0 where the potential jumps to be unboundedly large. The wavefunction does not "seep into" the region of infinite potential. The reason this must be can be seen in Schroedinger's equation: What happens when we try to put in V=infinity? What would d^2/dr^2*u or E have to be to satisfy the equation, and why would this be physically ruled out? On the other hand, if we just demand u=0 starting at r0, then the equation does not even need to be solved in a non-trivial way...it is trivially solved already.

If V is at infinity, then C= (2m/h-bar^2)*(V(x)-E)=(1/phi)*(d^2/dx^2) approaches infinity as well which means that wave function bends far away from the axis and the ground state function approaches zero.=> u=0, since u=r*phi_0

For B), this kind of reasoning is similar in many 1-dimensional problems. First think of just the well region where V=0. Then in that region you'd get free particle plane waves as solutions to the equation. But of course the particle isn't free because the V=0 region is not all there is to this particle's world; it sees the V=infinity jump. But we know that the conditions on the function u(r) are: u(r=0)=0=u(r=r0). So that just restricts the types of wavefunctions u(r) can be: Not just any exp(ikr) type plane wave, but a subset of them...what type of waveforms? Remember that the waveform you write down must be chosen so that the boundary conditions u(r=0)=0=u(r=r0) could be satisfied. You will also have to write down conditions on k such that the conditions are satisfied, just like in other 1-dimensional problems.

What is the ground state function, u(r), then? (Hint: note that we can write k in terms of known quantities). Putting u(r) in the Schr. eqn for the region r=[0,r0] will give you an eqn for E in terms of the mass, r0 and h-bar (Hint: What is V for this region?).


wouldn't u=sin(k*pi) , k being an integer; so now I would be able to put u in my Schrödinger equation to find V?
 
er... bump! DId I apply the correct line of reasoning and appproach to the problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K