Classical Canonical Partition Function in Two Dimensions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the classical canonical partition function in two dimensions, specifically focusing on the calculations involving a single particle's partition function and the implications of potential energy in different regions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the total partition function and average number of particles in a potential well, raising questions about the validity of their integrals and assumptions regarding the potential energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging with the original poster's calculations, providing feedback on specific integrals and questioning the assumptions made about the potential energy in certain regions. Some participants suggest that the integration limits and expressions may need reconsideration, while others express general agreement with the approach taken.

Contextual Notes

There is a discussion about the implications of a zero potential for certain values of radius, which may affect the integrals involved in the calculations. The dimensionality of area elements in the integrals is also under scrutiny.

Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider a classical gas in two dimensions trapped inside a circle of radius $R$ and a potential well given by
$$U= \begin{cases}
-U_0 & r<r_0 \\
0 & r\geq r_0 \\
\end{cases}
$$
Assume $$r_0<<R$$.
Find the canonical partition function for this system. Then find the average number of particles in the well and the average potential energy of the particles.
Relevant Equations
$$Z=\frac{1}{h^2}\int e^{-\beta H(p,q)}d^2pd^2q$$
$$H=\frac{P^2}{2m}+U(r)$$
For a single particle,
$$Z=\frac{1}{h^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta \frac{P^2}{2m}}d^2p \int e^{-U(r)}drd\theta=
\frac{1}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta}) 2\pi [\int_{0}^{r_0}e^{U_0}dr+\int_{r_0}^{R}dr]$$
$$
=\frac{1}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta}) 2\pi [e^{U_0}(r_0)+(R-r_0)]=\frac{\pi R^2}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta})2\pi [e^{U_0}\frac{(r_0)}{\pi R^2}+(\frac{R}{\pi R^2}-\frac{r_0}{\pi R^2})] \approx \frac{1}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta})2\pi R
$$
Thus,
$$Z_{tot}=(\frac{1}{\hbar^2}(\frac{m}{\beta})R)^N$$.
For the average number of particles in the well, I would assume it would be
$$<n>=\frac{N\frac{1}{h^2}\int e^{-\beta(\frac{P^2}{2m}-U_0)}d^2 p d^2q} {Z}=\frac{N\frac{1}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta}) 2 \pi \int_0^{r_0} e^{\beta U_0}dr} {Z}$$
and
$$<U>=\frac{N (-U_0)\frac{1}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta}) 2 \pi \int_0^{r_0} e^{\beta U_0}dr} {Z}$$
Would appreciate if anyone could confirm whether I'm on the right track. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the potential is zero for r > ro wouldn't that mean that your second integral from ro to R is zero? You integrated "1" when the potential states zero in this interval. Other than this everything else seems fine.
 
Diracobama2181 said:
For a single particle,
$$Z=\frac{1}{h^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta \frac{P^2}{2m}}d^2p \int e^{-U(r)}drd\theta$$
You wrote the area element ##d^2q## as ##dr d\theta##. But ##dr d\theta## doesn't have the dimensions of area.

Otherwise, I think you're on the right track.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Diracobama2181
Vitani1 said:
If the potential is zero for r > ro wouldn't that mean that your second integral from ro to R is zero? You integrated "1" when the potential states zero in this interval. Other than this everything else seems fine.

Are you referring to the last integral in the following expression for ##Z##?

Diracobama2181 said:
$$Z=\frac{1}{h^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\beta \frac{P^2}{2m}}d^2p \int e^{-U(r)}drd\theta=
\frac{1}{h^2}(\frac{2\pi m}{\beta}) 2\pi [\int_{0}^{r_0}e^{U_0}dr+\int_{r_0}^{R}dr]$$

The "1" looks Ok to me. ##e^0 = 1##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Diracobama2181
My apologies.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Diracobama2181

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K