Particle in Two Boxes: Impact of Dividing Barrier on Energy State

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisphd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
Click For Summary
Dividing a 1-dimensional box into two smaller boxes increases the minimum energy state of a particle due to the reduced length, as shown by the energy formula E = h^2/(8*m*(d/2)^2), resulting in E = 4*h^2/(8*m*d^2). This increase in energy raises questions about the implications of inserting a barrier, which requires energy input that could affect the particle's state. The discussion also touches on the concept of time-dependent potentials, indicating that such scenarios involve non-conserved energy influenced by external sources. Some participants argue that restricting the particle's movement actually decreases its energy by limiting its range of freedom. The conversation draws parallels to Gibbs' paradox, which relates to entropy in similar contexts.
chrisphd
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Suppose we have a particle in a 1-dimensional box, such that the particle is in its lowest energy state. The energy of a particle in a 1-dimensional box is E = h^2*n^2/(8*m*L^2). Therefore, if the particle is in its lowest energy level, n = 1, and the box has a length of d, then E = h^2/(8*m*d^2). Now suppose we divide the box into two boxes, A and B, using an impenetratable barrier so that each new box has a length of d/2. Now, if the particle is found to be in box A, the minimum energy it can have is n = 1, where E = h^2*n^2/(8*m*L^2) and therefore, E= h^2/(8*m*(d/2)^2) = 4*h^2/(8*m*d^2). This is the same for the particle being found in box B by symmetry. How is it possible that the energy has increased by simply adding a dividing barrier.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The process of insertion of the barrier would require energy. That energy would be transmitted to the particle. The whole process can be simulated by a time-dependent potential. It is known that a time-dependent potential corresponds to a non-conserved energy due to an external energy source.
 
To Me

Well Gentleman To Me The Energy Of Particle Is Decreased On Applying Barrier,bcoz We Have Restricted Particle To Finite Area.if We Further Introduce Separation,then Again Energy Is Decreased.so What We Are Doing,is Just Limiting Its Range Of Freeness.
Have You Studied Gibb's Paradox,it Also Tell The Same Thing But Regarding Entropy.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K