A problem about thin-film interference

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aurora_b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the order of interference and angles for bright light fringes in a thin-film interference scenario involving a transparent film with a thickness of 0.00325 cm and a refractive index of 1.4. The correct order of interference is determined to be 100, contrary to the user's initial calculation of 140. The first four angles for red light (6500 Å) forming bright fringes are identified as 5.73°, 9.94°, 12.84°, and 15.20°. Key insights include the necessity of incorporating the refractive index into the path difference calculation and the importance of using the correct angle of refraction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thin-film interference principles
  • Familiarity with the refractive index and its implications
  • Knowledge of constructive interference conditions
  • Ability to apply trigonometric functions in optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the path difference formula in thin-film interference
  • Learn about the impact of refractive index on wavelength in different media
  • Explore the concept of constructive and destructive interference in detail
  • Investigate the application of Snell's Law in calculating angles of refraction
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physics educators, and anyone involved in the study of light behavior in thin films will benefit from this discussion.

Aurora_b
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
1. Problem Statement:

A transparent film has thickness 0.00325 cm, refractive index= 1.4. Find

a) order of interference at theta=0° and
b) the first four angles at which red light 6500 A will form bright light fringes.

Ans:[ a)-100 ; b) - 5.73°, 9.94°, 12.84°, 15.20°]
Now this question seems quite simple but my answers aren't matching no matter what way I am using, obviously I am doing something wrong. Please help me out.2. Equations used:

Path difference = 2*n*d* cos(φ)

Where φ is the angle of refraction,
n is the refractive index,
d is the thickness.

Condition for constructive interference: (2m+1)* λ/2 (since there is a 180° phase change due to reflection)
3. Attempt at a solution :

a) for order of interference i simply did
m= path difference/λ
= [2*1.4*0.0000325]/[6500 * 10^(-10)] {Converting to meters}
=140
(Now i don't know why the given answer is 100

b) well the answers I am getting are bizarre so please help me out.

I used the formula for constructive interference.

2*n*d*cos Φ = (2m +1)*λ/2
Cos Φ = [(2m +1)*λ/2]/[2*n*d]

After putting the necessary values, the values of Φ i was getting were something like
for m=0, 89.9
for m=1, 99.317
etc

(Now when they say the first four angles in the question do they mean angle of incidence or the refraction angle or what? Because the above angles were for Φ which is angle of refraction.)

(This is a question from fundamentals of optics by Jenkins and white, Chapter 14, question 14.1)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20181121-200414.png
    Screenshot_20181121-200414.png
    28.4 KB · Views: 415
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
a) Maybe they missed out n in the formula for path difference. That would give 100. Textbooks can make mistakes.
b) Don't start putting in m = 0, 1... For angles close to 0, cos φ ≈ 1. So look for the first value of m (descending from high m) for which cos φ < 1. If their value of 100 for part a is right (let's assume so to see where they get their answers), the first value of cos φ is 199/200, which corresponds to φ = 5.73°.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aurora_b
mjc123 said:
a) Maybe they missed out n in the formula for path difference. That would give 100. Textbooks can make mistakes.
b) Don't start putting in m = 0, 1... For angles close to 0, cos φ ≈ 1. So look for the first value of m (descending from high m) for which cos φ < 1. If their value of 100 for part a is right (let's assume so to see where they get their answers), the first value of cos φ is 199/200, which corresponds to φ = 5.73°.
Thank you so much. I was really stuck. But we definitely need to put the n right? That must be a mistake in the book then. Thank you.
 
You either need to multiply the path length by n or divide the (vacuum) wavelength by n (which amounts to the same thing) to get the number of wavelengths (in the film) that the light travels in the film.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K