A problem from Binney and Tremaine

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter krishna mohan
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...

In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is [tex]\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c[/tex], where [tex]v_c[/tex] is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is [tex]v_c[/tex].
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?

Can anyone suggest anything?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For some reason, am not able to edit this post.
Please see the new post on the same topic.
 
The virial theorem is about the system as a whole, when it is in virial equilibrium. The v_c that you quote here is not a unique number for every star. In case of an isothermal sphere it is, as the mass distribution it has is such that the velocity is constant, as a function of radius. For all other mass distributions, v_c is a function of r, and the mass enclosed within r (M(r)): v_c^2 = M(r)/r So for any given mass distribution other than isothermal, the circular velocity is not constant. If all stars move on circular orbits, they will all have v_c as their velocity, but the value of v_c depends on the radii of all other orbits.