A problem from Binney and Tremaine

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter krishna mohan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on problem 4-9 from Binney and Tremaine's "Galactic Dynamics" first edition, specifically addressing the differences in RMS speed between a singular isothermal sphere and a system with randomly oriented circular orbits. In the isothermal sphere, the RMS speed is calculated as \(\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c\), while in the latter system, it is simply \(v_c\). This discrepancy raises questions about consistency with the virial theorem, which applies to systems in virial equilibrium. The key takeaway is that the circular velocity \(v_c\) varies with radius in non-isothermal distributions, affecting the kinetic energy per star.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the virial theorem in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with concepts of kinetic energy in stellar dynamics
  • Knowledge of isothermal spheres and their properties
  • Basic grasp of circular orbits and mass distribution in astrophysical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the virial theorem and its implications in astrophysical systems
  • Explore the properties of isothermal spheres in stellar dynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between mass distribution and circular velocity
  • Learn about the dynamics of systems with non-isothermal mass distributions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying stellar dynamics, particularly those interested in the applications of the virial theorem and the behavior of different mass distributions in galactic systems.

krishna mohan
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
Hi...

I have been pondering over this problem for sometime...
This is problem no 4-9 in Binney and Tremaine's Galactic Dynamics first edition...

In a singular isothermal sphere with an isotropic dispersion tensor, the RMS speed is \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}v_c, where v_c is the circular speed. In a system with the same mass distribution, but with all stars on randomly oriented circular orbits, the RMS speed is v_c.
Thus, the two systems have identical density distributions but different amounts of kinetic energy per star.
How is this consistent with the virial theorem?

Can anyone suggest anything?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For some reason, am not able to edit this post.
Please see the new post on the same topic.
 
The virial theorem is about the system as a whole, when it is in virial equilibrium. The v_c that you quote here is not a unique number for every star. In case of an isothermal sphere it is, as the mass distribution it has is such that the velocity is constant, as a function of radius. For all other mass distributions, v_c is a function of r, and the mass enclosed within r (M(r)): v_c^2 = M(r)/r So for any given mass distribution other than isothermal, the circular velocity is not constant. If all stars move on circular orbits, they will all have v_c as their velocity, but the value of v_c depends on the radii of all other orbits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K