A problem on quadratic equations .

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving two beakers, P and Q, containing water and acid, respectively. The process involves taking x liters from each beaker, mixing them, and replacing the mixture back into the beakers, repeated twice. After the second iteration, the amount of acid in beaker P is given as 71/8 liters, leading to the need to determine the value of x. Participants express confusion about the mixing and replacement process, prompting suggestions to test various values for x to understand the dynamics better. Ultimately, the goal is to form a quadratic equation based on the changes in acid concentration after the mixing and replacement steps.
  • #31
PeterO said:
You could have supplied a clear/concise solution to "similar" problem with different sized beakers as a guide to how such a question is solved.

People of different age need different explanation. If you need help to find a general solution to similar problems on your level of knowledge, I show you:

Assume you have two beakers P and Q. The volumes are Vp and Vq, both beakers are filled with a mixture of two fluids, "1" and "2". The concentrations of one of the components in the vessels are p and q, respectively. Assume that mixing of the components preserves the volume, that is, the volume of a mixture of v1 volume of component 1 and v2 volume of component 2 is v1+v2.

Taking x volume from both beakers and mixing them, the concentration of this sample is 0.5(p+q)

Returning x l of this mixture to beaker P, the new concentration p' becomes:

p'=[p(Vp-x)+0.5(p+q)x]/Vp=p+0.5(x/Vp)(q-p)

Returning x l of the sample mixture to Q, the new concentration q' becomes

q'=[q(Vq-x)+0.5(p+q)x]/Vq=q-0.5(x/Vq)(q-p)

In case of subsequent mixing steps you have the recurrence relations between concentrations:

p(n+1)=p(n)+0.5(x/Vp)(q(n)-p(n))

q(n-1)=q(n)-0.5(x/Vq)(q(n)-p(n))

I hope this is enough help for you to solve the original problem.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ehild said:
People of different age need different explanation. If you need help to find a general solution to similar problems on your level of knowledge, I show you:

Assume you have to beakers P and Q. The volumes are Vp and Vq, both beakers are filled with a mixture of two fluids, "1" and "2". The concentrations of one of the components in the vessels are p and q, respectively. Assume that mixing of the components preserves the volume, that is, the volume of a mixture of v1 volume of component 1 and v2 volume of component 2 is v1+v2.

Taking x volume from both beakers and mixing them, the concentration of this sample is 0.5(p+q)

Returning x l of this mixture to beaker P, the new concentration p' becomes:

p'=[p(Vp-x)+0.5(p+q)x]/Vp=p+0.5(x/Vp)(q-p)

Returning x l of the sample mixture to Q, the new concentration q' becomes

q'=[q(Vq-x)+0.5(p+q)x]/Vq=q-0.5(x/Vq)(q-p)

In case of subsequent mixing steps you have the recurrence relations between concentrations:

p(n+1)=p(n)+0.5(x/Vp)(q(n)-p(n))

q(n-1)=q(n)-0.5(x/Vq)(q(n)-p(n))

I hope this is enough help for you to solve the original problem.

ehild

Yeah, right; I am sure that is much simpler to follow.
 
  • #33
ehild said:
Sankalpmittal, you were almost at the end. You should not have given up.

Well, you determined correctly the amount of acid both in P and in Q after the first step of mixing. Taken out x l from both beakers and mixed, then returned x l back to each beakers, the amount of acid was x/2 l in P and 40-x/2 l in Q.
In the next step, x l is removed again from both bakers. The sample from P contains x2/100 l acid, and that from Q contains (40-x/2)x/40=(80x-x2)/80 l acid. The two samples altogether contain

x2/100+ (80x-x2)80= (400-x2)/400 l acid.

This mixture is halved and one half is returned to beaker P, the other to Beaker Q. The amount of acid in each half is

(400-x2)/800 l.

(You were here, making only a little mistake.)

As x2/100 l acid has been removed from beaker P at the beginning of the second mixing step, it contains

(x/2-x2/100) l

acid in the (50-x) l solution. Now x l mixture is returned, with (400x-x2)/800 l acid content. So the total amount of acid becomes

x/2-x^2/100+(400x-x^2)/800=\frac{400x-8x^2+400x-x^2}{800}=\frac{800x-9x^2}{800}.

This amount is given in the problem, it is 71/8 l.

So your quadratic equation is

\frac{800x-9x^2}{800}=\frac{71}{8}

Can you continue from here? Have you learned solving quadratic equations?

You will get two roots, but one is physically meaningless. Let me see what you get for x. I am not allowed to give full solution.

ehild.

9x2-800x+7100 = 0
9x2-90x-710x+7100=0
9x(x-10)-710(x-10)=0
(x-10)(9x-710)=0

These are the two roots of equation . The second root isn't possible because the value exceeds 50 . So the appropriate answer is that x is equal to 10 l .


Yes , I have learned quadratic equations in class 8th . This question was rather different though .

ehild said:
People of different age need different explanation. If you need help to find a general solution to similar problems on your level of knowledge, I show you:

Assume you have two beakers P and Q. The volumes are Vp and Vq, both beakers are filled with a mixture of two fluids, "1" and "2". The concentrations of one of the components in the vessels are p and q, respectively. Assume that mixing of the components preserves the volume, that is, the volume of a mixture of v1 volume of component 1 and v2 volume of component 2 is v1+v2.

Taking x volume from both beakers and mixing them, the concentration of this sample is 0.5(p+q)

Returning x l of this mixture to beaker P, the new concentration p' becomes:

p'=[p(Vp-x)+0.5(p+q)x]/Vp=p+0.5(x/Vp)(q-p)

Returning x l of the sample mixture to Q, the new concentration q' becomes

q'=[q(Vq-x)+0.5(p+q)x]/Vq=q-0.5(x/Vq)(q-p)

In case of subsequent mixing steps you have the recurrence relations between concentrations:

p(n+1)=p(n)+0.5(x/Vp)(q(n)-p(n))

q(n-1)=q(n)-0.5(x/Vq)(q(n)-p(n))

I hope this is enough help for you to solve the original problem.

ehild

Hm. This part is something which I am unable to understand. Your previous train of thoughts was easier to follow.


Thanks !
 
  • #34
Well done! And you are right, it was a difficult problem, something for people over 18... Now you can teach your teachers how to solve such problems of mixing :wink:

The other method was for PeterO, he felt it easier than the one I showed to you.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K