using an exponential regulator [tex] exp(-\epsilon n) [/tex] the sum(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+............= -1/12+ 1/\epsilon^{2} [/tex]

and for Casimir effect [tex] 1+8+27+64+125+............= -1/120+ 1/\epsilon^{4} [/tex]

can i simply remove in the calculations of divergent series 1+2+3+4+5.. and similar the epsilon terms imposing renormalization conditions ??

how about for the rest of sums [tex] 1+2^{m}+3^{m}+..........= \zeta (-m) + 1/\epsilon ^{m+1} [/tex]

if i introducte a power regulator [tex] n^{-s} [/tex] in the limit s-->0+ i would get

[tex] \zeta(s-m)=\zeta(-m) [/tex] but i am not sure, why this work

for example in the definition of a functional determinant (in differential geommetry )

[tex] \prod_{i} \lambda_{i} [/tex] apparently there is no divergent term proportional to [tex] log(\epsilon) [/tex] as one would expect since the product is divergent

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A problem with sums 1+2+3+4+5+6

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**