MHB A proof about maximum point, critical point and differentiation

Click For Summary
If a function f is continuous on a set E and has a local maximum at point a, then either f is differentiable at a with a derivative of zero, or it is not differentiable at that point. If f is differentiable on the interior of E, a global maximum point must be a critical point or lie on the boundary of E. The proof demonstrates that if f is differentiable at a local maximum, the derivative must equal zero, confirming a critical point. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between differentiability, critical points, and maximum values in optimization. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing functions in mathematical optimization.
i_a_n
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Let $E\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ and $f: E\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function. Prove that if $a$ is a local maximum point for $f$, then either $f$ is differentiable at $x = a$ and $Df(a) = 0$ or $f$ is not differentiable at $x = a$. Deduce that if $f$ is differentiable on $E^o$, then a global maximum point of f is either a critical point of f or an element of $∂E$.It's a little bit about optimization but stil analysis. Well I have no idea about this question and I think I need a proof. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If a is the local maximum then

either f is differentiable at a, or its not.

if f is differentiable at a.

Then for a neighborhood $U$ containing a, f(x) = f(a) + Df(a)(x-a)

Since by def of local max, for any $\epsilon > 0$, |x-a|<$\epsilon$ implies
f(x) $\leq$ f(a).

f(a) + Df(a)|(x-a)| $\leq$ f(a) for a small neighborhood around a.

so Df(a)|x-a| $\leq $ 0, or Df(a) = 0.

If f is differentiable on the interior of a set $E$, and if there exists an open ball located in $E$ which contains the global max a, a type of local max, then i showed earlier Df(a) = 0 (thus a critical point). If there exists no such open ball which contains point a, it is in the closure of E.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K