A question about sturm liouville theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Sturm-Liouville theory, specifically the linear differential equation represented as Lu = λu, where L is a Hermitian operator. It is established that while the eigenfunctions of this equation form a complete set capable of constructing other functions through linear combinations, not every function is a solution to the equation. The key issue arises from the fact that eigenvectors corresponding to different eigenvalues do not yield eigenvectors when summed, highlighting a fundamental limitation in the linearity of the solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with Hermitian operators
  • Knowledge of eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Basic concepts of linear transformations in vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of eigenvalue multiplicity in Sturm-Liouville problems
  • Learn about the completeness of eigenfunction sets in functional analysis
  • Investigate applications of Sturm-Liouville theory in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students interested in differential equations, linear algebra, and their applications in various scientific fields.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
Consider the linear differential equation below:
[itex] Lu=\lambda u[/itex]
With L a hermitian operator.
We know that the eigen functions of this equation form a complete set.
So they can build every other function with their linear combination.
But from linearity of the Differential equation,we know that any linear combination of answers is also an answer so it follows that every function is a solution to this equation!
This can easily be shown to be wrong.
What's the problem?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The same could be said for most linear transformations on finite dimensional vector spaces. The main problem is that different eigenvectors typically have different eigenvalues, so sums of eigenvectors are not usually eigenvectors (unless they all have the same eigenvalue).
 
Oh,yes!
You mean we have:
[itex] Lu_1=\lambda_1 u_1[/itex]
but
[itex] Lu_2=\lambda_2 u_2[/itex]
Yeah.
I understand now
thanks
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K