A question on publication process in Physical Review D

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunny Singh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Publishing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the publication process for a paper accepted in Physical Review D, where the author identified a minor calculation error that affects a table's coefficient value but does not alter the paper's main conclusions. The author seeks guidance on whether to contact the editor immediately or wait for the proofreading phase to request changes. It is established that contacting the editor promptly is essential, as they will provide options based on the paper's current production status.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the publication process in academic journals
  • Familiarity with the editorial communication protocols
  • Knowledge of erratum procedures in scientific publishing
  • Basic grasp of manuscript production phases
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the publication process in Physical Review D
  • Learn about the role of editors in academic publishing
  • Investigate how to properly draft an email to an editor regarding manuscript changes
  • Understand the criteria for issuing an erratum in scientific literature
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, authors preparing manuscripts for publication, and anyone involved in the academic publishing process who needs to navigate corrections and editorial communications effectively.

Sunny Singh
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Dear All,

A few days ago, my first paper in Physical Review D got accepted, but today, I found out that there is a minor mistake in the paper that changes the value of a quantity in a table. It doesn't change the final results, the physics or the paper's main point. It's just a calculation error. I need to make three changes-- change the value in the table for one of the 7 coefficients, one equation for the expression for that particular coefficient, and I need to strike out 3 lines that discuss that coefficient's earlier value.

What should I do now? Should I contact the editor or should i request these changes in the proofreading phase? And will these changes be published as an erratum or since I caught this before it actually gets published, it won't be shown as an erratum?

PS. I can see that it has gone into production phase now.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the editor know right away. He/she will tell you what the options are based on where it is in the process.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sunny Singh
Vanadium 50 said:
Let the editor know right away. He/she will tell you what the options are based on where it is in the process.
Thanks. I'll send an email to the editor today itself.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
632
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
15K