1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A question on the operator e^D

  1. Jun 4, 2008 #1
    if D means the derivative respect to x , is always licit to use this operator ??

    for example Ramanujan obtained his Master theorem from the integral equality

    [tex] \int_{0}^{\infty} dx e^{-ax} x^{m-1} = \Gamma (m) a^{-m] [/tex]

    by just replacing the 'a' number by the operator exp(D) and expanding exp(-exp(x) but is this valid ?? , can we always replace real numbers by operators ??
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 4, 2008 #2
    For your first questions If you want to use the operator e^D the functions it acts on must certainly be C^\infty or in some other weak sense differentiable an infinite number of times.

    To your second question: in this special case it seems to have been correct (maybe not properly justified, though).

    Your last question: In principle: yes, but a true statement may become false if you replace numbers by operators. Consider ab=ba which is true for real numbers a und b but not true for non-commuting operators.

    Pere
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: A question on the operator e^D
  1. A general e-d proof (Replies: 3)

  2. Question about e (Replies: 4)

  3. Question regarding e (Replies: 8)

  4. Is d/dx e^-x = e^-x ? (Replies: 18)

Loading...