Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

A question on the operator e^D

  1. Jun 4, 2008 #1
    if D means the derivative respect to x , is always licit to use this operator ??

    for example Ramanujan obtained his Master theorem from the integral equality

    [tex] \int_{0}^{\infty} dx e^{-ax} x^{m-1} = \Gamma (m) a^{-m] [/tex]

    by just replacing the 'a' number by the operator exp(D) and expanding exp(-exp(x) but is this valid ?? , can we always replace real numbers by operators ??
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 4, 2008 #2
    For your first questions If you want to use the operator e^D the functions it acts on must certainly be C^\infty or in some other weak sense differentiable an infinite number of times.

    To your second question: in this special case it seems to have been correct (maybe not properly justified, though).

    Your last question: In principle: yes, but a true statement may become false if you replace numbers by operators. Consider ab=ba which is true for real numbers a und b but not true for non-commuting operators.

    Pere
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: A question on the operator e^D
  1. A general e-d proof (Replies: 3)

  2. Question about e (Replies: 4)

  3. Question regarding e (Replies: 8)

  4. Is d/dx e^-x = e^-x ? (Replies: 18)

Loading...