A short proof of the Poincare Lemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

SUMMARY

The discussion presents a concise proof of the Poincaré Lemma for smooth differential k-forms defined near the origin in ℝm. It establishes that any closed k-form ω (with dω = 0) is exact in some open ball around the origin, meaning there exists a (k-1)-form Ω such that dΩ = ω. The proof uses the radial vector field v(x) = x and its flow gt(x) = etx, applying the Lie derivative and Cartan's magic formula to relate the pullback of ω under the flow to an integral expression for Ω. The key step involves integrating the derivative of the pullback from -∞ to 0 and leveraging the exponential decay to show Ω explicitly as an integral involving the interior product ivω.

PREREQUISITES

  • Differential forms and exterior calculus (k-forms, exterior derivative d)
  • Lie derivative and Cartan's magic formula (𝓛v = d iv + iv d)
  • Flow of vector fields and pullback operations on differential forms
  • Integration of differential forms and limits in smooth manifolds

NEXT STEPS

  • Study Cartan’s homotopy formula and its applications in differential geometry
  • Explore de Rham cohomology and its relation to exact and closed forms
  • Learn about flows of vector fields and their role in geometric analysis
  • Investigate generalizations of the Poincaré Lemma to manifolds with boundary or singularities

USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and graduate students specializing in differential geometry, algebraic topology, and geometric analysis who require a rigorous understanding of the Poincaré Lemma and its proof techniques.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
1,113
I would like to share a concise proof of the Poincaré Lemma

Theorem (Poincaré Lemma)
Assume that a smooth ##k##-form (##k\in\mathbb{N}##)
$$\omega = \sum_{i_1 < \dots < i_k} \omega_{i_1 \dots i_k} (x) dx^{i_1} \wedge \dots \wedge dx^{i_k}$$
is defined in a neighbourhood of the origin in ##\mathbb{R}^m##.
If ##\omega## is closed (##d\omega = 0##), then it is exact in some open ball ##B## centered at the origin. That is, there exists a ##(k-1)##-form ##\Omega## such that ##d\Omega = \omega##.


Proof
Consider the radial vector field ##v(x) = x##. The corresponding flow is given by ##g^t(x) = e^t x##. The pullback of ##\omega## under this flow is:
$$g^t_* \omega = e^{kt} \sum_{i_1 < \dots < i_k} \omega_{i_1 \dots i_k}(e^t x) dx^{i_1} \wedge \dots \wedge dx^{i_k}.$$
From the definition of the Lie derivative , we have:
$$\frac{d}{dt} g^t_* \omega = g^t_* \mathcal{L}_v \omega.$$
By applying Cartan's magic formula and the fact that the exterior derivative
commutes with the pullback (##d g^t_* = g^t_* d##), we obtain:
$$\frac{d}{dt} g^t_* \omega = g^t_* (d i_v \omega + i_v d \omega) = d(g^t_* i_v \omega)$$
where we used the assumption ##d\omega = 0##.

Now, we integrate both sides with respect to ##t## from ##-\infty## to ##0##:
$$\int_{-\infty}^0 \frac{d}{dt} (g^t_* \omega) \, dt = \int_{-\infty}^0 d(g^t_* i_v \omega) \, dt.$$
The term ##g^t_* \omega## vanishes as ##t \to -\infty## due to the ##e^{kt}## factor. Thus, the left-hand side evaluates to:
$$g^0_* \omega - \lim_{t \to -\infty} g^t_* \omega = \omega - 0 = \omega.$$
Pulling the exterior derivative out of the integral on the right-hand side, we get:
$$\omega = d \left( \int_{-\infty}^0 g^t_* i_v \omega \, dt \right).$$
Therefore, ##\Omega = \int_{-\infty}^0 g^t_* i_v \omega \, dt## is the required ##(k-1)##-form.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K