B A quick question about Planck's constant

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the misunderstanding of Planck's constant, which is clarified as a real number rather than an energy oscillator composed of imaginary and real numbers. Participants emphasize the importance of proper citations for claims made about scientific concepts. They highlight that while complex numbers and oscillators are relevant in quantum mechanics, understanding them requires mathematical context. The original poster acknowledges a potential misinterpretation of the book's content. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for clarity and accuracy in discussing scientific principles.
hongseok
Messages
20
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
What does it mean to say that Planck's constant is an energy oscillator composed of imaginary and real numbers?
This is an expression I saw in a book.
What does it mean to say that Planck's constant is an energy oscillator composed of imaginary and real numbers?
This is an expression I saw in a book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hongseok said:
This is an expression I saw in a book.
@hongseok, "I saw in a book" is exactly equivalent to "I overheard some guy on a bus saying" and is not a valid reference here on PF. We would need to know EXACTLY what you read and who said it so please make specific citations for such questions.
 
  • Like
Likes hongseok, pines-demon, hutchphd and 1 other person
hongseok said:
What does it mean to say that Planck's constant is an energy oscillator composed of imaginary and real numbers?
This is an expression I saw in a book.
Either the book is wrong or you have misunderstood what it was saying.
Planck's constant is a number not an oscillator, and it is real not imaginary.

It is true that complex numbers and oscillators appear through the mathematics of quantum mechanics, but there's no way of making sense of that without actually doing the math. For that you will need a proper textbook, there are a bunch of recommendations in other threads here.
 
hongseok said:
This is an expression I saw in a book.
What book?
 
Lets see what the OP says. I suspect the book is not in English, though. I searched for the quote and found nothing.
 
Thank you everyone. As you said, it is not a book written in English. After referring to other threads, I think I misunderstood the context of the book.
Thank you for answering my inexperienced questions with sincerity.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and phinds
Solution of time independent Shroedinger equation with energy eugenvalue E holds oscillating factor of
e^{iE/ \hbar \ t} in time. That was my best guess.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K