A rather weird form of a coherent state

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of coherent states in quantum mechanics, specifically the expression of position and momentum operators using ladder operators. The coherent state is defined as $$|\alpha \rangle = e^{-{|\alpha |^{2} \over 2}}e^{\alpha {\hat {a}}^{\dagger }}|0\rangle$$, and the user questions whether the alternative definition $$\vert \alpha\rangle = e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle$$ is indeed an eigenstate of the annihilation operator $$a$$. The conversation progresses to proving the relationship $$a(a^\dagger)^m = m(a^\dagger)^{m-1} +(a^\dagger)^ma$$, confirming that the eigenvalue must be dimensionless, thus invalidating the direct use of $$\alpha$$ in its current form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coherent states in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with ladder operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of the commutation relations between operators
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs involving series and binomial expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of coherent states in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the properties of ladder operators in quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Research the implications of eigenstates and eigenvalues in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the use of commutation relations in quantum operator algebra
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on quantum mechanics and coherent states will benefit from this discussion.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Show that the coherent state $$\vert \alpha\rangle = e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle$$ is an eigenstate of the annihilation operator of the harmonic oscillator.
Relevant Equations
Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator: $$H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+ \frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2.$$
As far as I know we can express the position and momentum operators in terms of ladder operators in the following way
$${\begin{aligned}{ {x}}&={\sqrt {{\frac {\hbar }{2}}{\frac {1}{m\omega }}}}(a^{\dagger }+a)\\{{p}}&=i{\sqrt {{\frac {\hbar }{2}}m\omega }}(a^{\dagger }-a)~.\end{aligned}}.$$
With this the coherent state is usually defined as
$$|\alpha \rangle =e^{-{|\alpha |^{2} \over 2}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\alpha ^{n} \over {\sqrt {n!}}}|n\rangle =e^{-{|\alpha |^{2} \over 2}}e^{\alpha {\hat {a}}^{\dagger }}|0\rangle,$$
and it can be pretty easily shown that ##\vert \alpha\rangle ## is indeed an eigenstate of ##a##. But if we take the definition given in the exercise
$$\vert \alpha\rangle = e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle$$
I have some doubts if this is really an eigenstate...
  1. First of, ##p## has units of momentum, so how exactly can this be written in an exponential function? Do we assume that ##\alpha## has units of inverse momentum?
  2. Secondly, how exactly does one show that this ##\vert \alpha\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a##? My attempt was straight forward $$ a \vert\alpha\rangle = a\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}(\alpha p)^k \vert 0\rangle =\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle.$$ To continue form here on I would need to to rewrite ##ap^k## using the Binomial theorem, which resulted in $$ap^k = \Gamma^k a (a-a^\dagger)^k = \Gamma^k a \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n}a^{n}(-a^\dagger)^{k-n}.$$ Now the question arises what exactly ##a(a^\dagger)^{k-n}## is and I think it should be ##a(a^\dagger)^{k-n}=(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}+(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a##, but I wasn't able to prove this yet.
At this point I stopped since I was starting to doubt my approach here... Is this the wrong way to show that ##e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a##? If so, can somebody maybe help me out a bit in how to prove this here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a few ways to do this, and your approach (including your idea of proving the formula a(a^\dagger)^{k-n}=(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}+(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a, which is true) is one such way. To begin to prove that formula, try playing with small integer values of the exponent of a^{\dagger} to find the pattern.

You're right that now \alpha will need units. Since the eigenvalue of a needs to be dimensionless, this means it won't simply be \alpha anymore.
 
  • Like
Likes Markus Kahn
Thank you for the reply!

Now I was able to prove the statement: ##a(a^\dagger)^m = m(a^\dagger)^{m-1} +(a^\dagger)^ma## for ##m\in\mathbb{N}_0##.
Proof: For ##m=0## the statement is trivially true. Let us assume the statement is true for ##m=n##. We then have
$$\begin{align*}a(a^\dagger)^{n+1}&=aa^\dagger(a^\dagger)^n = (a^\dagger)^n+a^\dagger a (a^\dagger)^n= (a^\dagger)^n+a^\dagger \left(n(a^\dagger)^{n-1}+(a^\dagger)^na\right)\\&=(n+1)(a^\dagger)^n+(a^\dagger)^{n+1}a\end{align*}$$

After proving this I tried to continue but encountered a bit of an issue. What I want in the end is ##a\vert\alpha\rangle = \alpha\vert\alpha\rangle##, which is equivalent to
$$a\vert\alpha\rangle=\alpha \vert\alpha\rangle = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^{k+1}p^k \vert 0\rangle.\tag{*}$$
If I now insert the above proof into my previous result I get
$$\begin{align*}a\vert\alpha\rangle& = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle\\
&= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k a \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n}a^{n}(-a^\dagger)^{k-n}\right]\vert 0\rangle \\
&=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n} a^n (-1)^{k-n}\left((k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}+(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a\right)\right]\vert 0\rangle
.\end{align*}$$
The term with ##(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a## can be ignored since ##a\vert 0\rangle=0.## We therefore end up with
$$a\vert\alpha\rangle = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n} a^n (-1)^{k-n}(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}\right]\vert 0\rangle. $$
If I compare this equation to eq. ##(*)## I need to show that
$$\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^{k+1}p^k = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n} a^n (-1)^{k-n}(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}\right].$$
After looking at this for a while I'm pretty sure I need to perfrom an index shift at some point, but the bigger problem for me right now is that I can't piece together the momentum operator ##p## on the righthand-side due to the Binomial coefficient. Can you maybe help me here?
 
Markus Kahn said:
What I want in the end is ##a\vert\alpha\rangle = \alpha\vert\alpha\rangle##
Since the operator ##a## is dimensionless, the eigenvalue will be dimensionless. So, the eigenvalue cannot be ##\alpha## since ##\alpha## has dimensions of inverse momentum.

$$a\vert\alpha\rangle = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle$$
Note that ##a p^k \vert 0 \rangle = [a, p^k] \vert 0 \rangle##. The commutator ##[a, p^k]## reduces to a fairly simple expression. First work out ##[a, p]##, ##[a, p^2]##, and ##[a, p^3]## to see the pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes Markus Kahn
Thanks for the help. Let ##\Gamma = i{\sqrt {{\frac {\hbar }{2}}{{m\omega }}}}## such that ##p=\Gamma (a^\dagger -a)##.
  • ##[a,p]=\Gamma##
  • ##[a,p^2]=2\Gamma^2 (a^\dagger-a)##
  • ##[a,p^3]=\Gamma^3 (4{a^\dagger}^2-3a^2-3a^\dagger a -aa^\dagger)##
Now the last one is probably wrong, since there is no pattern I can recognize there (I checked it multiple times and always got this result, so I'm probably doing something systematically wrong)... If I had to guess based on the first two, I'd say the pattern is something along the lines of
$$[a,p^k]=k\Gamma^k (a^\dagger - a)^{k-1}= k\Gamma p^{k-1}$$
Proof. For ##k=0## the statement is trivially true. Assume the statement is true for ##k=n##. We then have
$$[a,p^{n+1}]=p^n[a,p]+[a,p^{n}]p = p^n\Gamma +n \Gamma p^n = (n+1)\Gamma p^n.$$
So it seems my guess was right.

From your input I'm now able to get
$$\begin{align*}a\vert\alpha\rangle
&= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k [a,p^k] \vert 0\rangle= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k k\Gamma p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle\\
&=\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(k-1)!}\alpha^k p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle = \alpha\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k p^k \vert 0\rangle=\alpha\Gamma\vert \alpha\rangle,
\end{align*}$$
where I'm not really sure about the last step, since I can't really justify why the first term in the sum is zero.

P.S. Am I correct in assuming that my first approach therefore couldn't produce the desired result.
 
Markus Kahn said:
$$[a,p^k]=k\Gamma^k (a^\dagger - a)^{k-1}= k\Gamma p^{k-1}$$
Yes

From your input I'm now able to get
$$\begin{align*}a\vert\alpha\rangle
&= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k [a,p^k] \vert 0\rangle= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k k\Gamma p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle\\
&=\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(k-1)!}\alpha^k p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle = \alpha\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k p^k \vert 0\rangle=\alpha\Gamma\vert \alpha\rangle,
\end{align*}$$
where I'm not really sure about the last step, since I can't really justify why the first term in the sum is zero.
Go to the first equality where you have
$$a\vert\alpha\rangle
= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle$$
You can see that k = 0 yields zero contribution.

P.S. Am I correct in assuming that my first approach therefore couldn't produce the desired result.
Your first approach might work. But it was looking messy.
 
  • Like
Likes Markus Kahn

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K