A rather weird form of a coherent state

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Show that the coherent state $$\vert \alpha\rangle = e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle$$ is an eigenstate of the annihilation operator of the harmonic oscillator.
Relevant Equations
Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator: $$H = \frac{p^2}{2m}+ \frac{m\omega^2}{2}x^2.$$
As far as I know we can express the position and momentum operators in terms of ladder operators in the following way
$${\begin{aligned}{ {x}}&={\sqrt {{\frac {\hbar }{2}}{\frac {1}{m\omega }}}}(a^{\dagger }+a)\\{{p}}&=i{\sqrt {{\frac {\hbar }{2}}m\omega }}(a^{\dagger }-a)~.\end{aligned}}.$$
With this the coherent state is usually defined as
$$|\alpha \rangle =e^{-{|\alpha |^{2} \over 2}}\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }{\alpha ^{n} \over {\sqrt {n!}}}|n\rangle =e^{-{|\alpha |^{2} \over 2}}e^{\alpha {\hat {a}}^{\dagger }}|0\rangle,$$
and it can be pretty easily shown that ##\vert \alpha\rangle ## is indeed an eigenstate of ##a##. But if we take the definition given in the exercise
$$\vert \alpha\rangle = e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle$$
I have some doubts if this is really an eigenstate...
  1. First of, ##p## has units of momentum, so how exactly can this be written in an exponential function? Do we assume that ##\alpha## has units of inverse momentum?
  2. Secondly, how exactly does one show that this ##\vert \alpha\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a##? My attempt was straight forward $$ a \vert\alpha\rangle = a\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}(\alpha p)^k \vert 0\rangle =\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle.$$ To continue form here on I would need to to rewrite ##ap^k## using the Binomial theorem, which resulted in $$ap^k = \Gamma^k a (a-a^\dagger)^k = \Gamma^k a \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n}a^{n}(-a^\dagger)^{k-n}.$$ Now the question arises what exactly ##a(a^\dagger)^{k-n}## is and I think it should be ##a(a^\dagger)^{k-n}=(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}+(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a##, but I wasn't able to prove this yet.
At this point I stopped since I was starting to doubt my approach here... Is this the wrong way to show that ##e^{\alpha p}\vert 0\rangle## is an eigenstate of ##a##? If so, can somebody maybe help me out a bit in how to prove this here?
 
There are a few ways to do this, and your approach (including your idea of proving the formula [itex]a(a^\dagger)^{k-n}=(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}+(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a[/itex], which is true) is one such way. To begin to prove that formula, try playing with small integer values of the exponent of [itex]a^{\dagger}[/itex] to find the pattern.

You're right that now [itex]\alpha[/itex] will need units. Since the eigenvalue of [itex]a[/itex] needs to be dimensionless, this means it won't simply be [itex]\alpha[/itex] anymore.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Markus Kahn
Thank you for the reply!

Now I was able to prove the statement: ##a(a^\dagger)^m = m(a^\dagger)^{m-1} +(a^\dagger)^ma## for ##m\in\mathbb{N}_0##.
Proof: For ##m=0## the statement is trivially true. Let us assume the statement is true for ##m=n##. We then have
$$\begin{align*}a(a^\dagger)^{n+1}&=aa^\dagger(a^\dagger)^n = (a^\dagger)^n+a^\dagger a (a^\dagger)^n= (a^\dagger)^n+a^\dagger \left(n(a^\dagger)^{n-1}+(a^\dagger)^na\right)\\&=(n+1)(a^\dagger)^n+(a^\dagger)^{n+1}a\end{align*}$$

After proving this I tried to continue but encountered a bit of an issue. What I want in the end is ##a\vert\alpha\rangle = \alpha\vert\alpha\rangle##, which is equivalent to
$$a\vert\alpha\rangle=\alpha \vert\alpha\rangle = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^{k+1}p^k \vert 0\rangle.\tag{*}$$
If I now insert the above proof into my previous result I get
$$\begin{align*}a\vert\alpha\rangle& = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle\\
&= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k a \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n}a^{n}(-a^\dagger)^{k-n}\right]\vert 0\rangle \\
&=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n} a^n (-1)^{k-n}\left((k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}+(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a\right)\right]\vert 0\rangle
.\end{align*}$$
The term with ##(a^\dagger)^{k-n}a## can be ignored since ##a\vert 0\rangle=0.## We therefore end up with
$$a\vert\alpha\rangle = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n} a^n (-1)^{k-n}(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}\right]\vert 0\rangle. $$
If I compare this equation to eq. ##(*)## I need to show that
$$\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^{k+1}p^k = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k \left[\Gamma^k \sum _{n=0}^{k}{k \choose n} a^n (-1)^{k-n}(k-n)(a^{\dagger})^{k-n-1}\right].$$
After looking at this for a while I'm pretty sure I need to perfrom an index shift at some point, but the bigger problem for me right now is that I can't piece together the momentum operator ##p## on the righthand-side due to the Binomial coefficient. Can you maybe help me here?
 
Markus Kahn said:
What I want in the end is ##a\vert\alpha\rangle = \alpha\vert\alpha\rangle##
Since the operator ##a## is dimensionless, the eigenvalue will be dimensionless. So, the eigenvalue cannot be ##\alpha## since ##\alpha## has dimensions of inverse momentum.

$$a\vert\alpha\rangle = \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle$$
Note that ##a p^k \vert 0 \rangle = [a, p^k] \vert 0 \rangle##. The commutator ##[a, p^k]## reduces to a fairly simple expression. First work out ##[a, p]##, ##[a, p^2]##, and ##[a, p^3]## to see the pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Markus Kahn
Thanks for the help. Let ##\Gamma = i{\sqrt {{\frac {\hbar }{2}}{{m\omega }}}}## such that ##p=\Gamma (a^\dagger -a)##.
  • ##[a,p]=\Gamma##
  • ##[a,p^2]=2\Gamma^2 (a^\dagger-a)##
  • ##[a,p^3]=\Gamma^3 (4{a^\dagger}^2-3a^2-3a^\dagger a -aa^\dagger)##
Now the last one is probably wrong, since there is no pattern I can recognize there (I checked it multiple times and always got this result, so I'm probably doing something systematically wrong)... If I had to guess based on the first two, I'd say the pattern is something along the lines of
$$[a,p^k]=k\Gamma^k (a^\dagger - a)^{k-1}= k\Gamma p^{k-1}$$
Proof. For ##k=0## the statement is trivially true. Assume the statement is true for ##k=n##. We then have
$$[a,p^{n+1}]=p^n[a,p]+[a,p^{n}]p = p^n\Gamma +n \Gamma p^n = (n+1)\Gamma p^n.$$
So it seems my guess was right.

From your input I'm now able to get
$$\begin{align*}a\vert\alpha\rangle
&= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k [a,p^k] \vert 0\rangle= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k k\Gamma p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle\\
&=\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(k-1)!}\alpha^k p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle = \alpha\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k p^k \vert 0\rangle=\alpha\Gamma\vert \alpha\rangle,
\end{align*}$$
where I'm not really sure about the last step, since I can't really justify why the first term in the sum is zero.

P.S. Am I correct in assuming that my first approach therefore couldn't produce the desired result.
 
Markus Kahn said:
$$[a,p^k]=k\Gamma^k (a^\dagger - a)^{k-1}= k\Gamma p^{k-1}$$
Yes

From your input I'm now able to get
$$\begin{align*}a\vert\alpha\rangle
&= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle=\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k [a,p^k] \vert 0\rangle= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k k\Gamma p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle\\
&=\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{(k-1)!}\alpha^k p^{k-1} \vert 0\rangle = \alpha\Gamma \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k p^k \vert 0\rangle=\alpha\Gamma\vert \alpha\rangle,
\end{align*}$$
where I'm not really sure about the last step, since I can't really justify why the first term in the sum is zero.
Go to the first equality where you have
$$a\vert\alpha\rangle
= \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}\alpha^k ap^k \vert 0\rangle$$
You can see that k = 0 yields zero contribution.

P.S. Am I correct in assuming that my first approach therefore couldn't produce the desired result.
Your first approach might work. But it was looking messy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Markus Kahn

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K