A simple differential equation problem.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation derived from a physics problem, specifically addressing the equation's formulation and potential methods for solving it. Participants explore various interpretations of the equation, the definitions of its symbols, and different approaches to finding a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a differential equation related to a physics problem and questions its validity.
  • Another participant suggests rewriting the equation in a standard form and mentions using an integrating factor for solving it.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of definitions for the symbols used in the equation, leading to confusion.
  • Participants clarify the meanings of the symbols, including masses, angle, volume, and density.
  • One participant proposes a potential solution form involving trigonometric functions.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriate method for solving the differential equation, with some advocating for the use of an integrating factor while others suggest separation of variables.
  • Participants express differing views on whether the equation is separable or not, with some acknowledging a mistake in their earlier assessment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the differential equation, with multiple competing views on the use of integrating factors versus separation of variables. There is also disagreement regarding the separability of the equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining symbols clearly, as the lack of definitions leads to misunderstandings. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with differential equations and their solution techniques.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
is there a solution to this euqation: (i got to in a problem in physics so the notation is appropiate):
[tex](m_1+m_2)\frac{dv}{dt}=m_1g-m_2gsin(a)-f_s-\beta v-V\rho g[/tex]
is there a solution or perhaps i got it wrong in equations?
thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the notation might be appropriate, but your definition of the symbols is not!
Assuming that everything is constant apart from v,
just rewrite your diff. eq as:
[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}+Av=B[/tex]
where A and B are constants.
You may use an integrating factor to solve this problem.
This will also work for non-constant A and B (depending solely on t, and not on v!), but you might not get an explicit formula in terms of elementary functions then.
 
Last edited:
what's wrong with my interpratation of the symbols?
 
It is lacking. How should I know what you mean by your symbols when you don't define them?
 
well, the m's are masses, the angle a doesn't change with time (perhaps here lies your critic), V stands for volume and rho stand for water density.
that's it.
 
perhaps, v=Acos(b)+Bsin(b) is a possible solution here?
 
Hmm..and I guess that g is the acceleration due to gravity and beta is the coefficient of air resistance. But you didn't sayu that.
Furthermore f_s is some sort of applied force I don't know what is.
 
what integrating factor to use here?
i mean: dv/v+Adt=Bdt/v dv/v+(A-B/v)dt=0
dv/v(A+B/v)+dt=0 will that suffice here?
 
this is a pretty simple integrating factor

if you mmove the resistance term (Bv) to the left hand side and divide by (m1+m2) than you have an quation of the formdv/dt +Pv = Q

where Q is some function of t, and so is P

in a problem like this the integrating factor is e^(integral of P dt)

multiplying by that and simplifying will get you an equation of the formd(ve^(integral P dt))/dt =Qe^(integral P dt)

integrate, and then you'll have a simple algebra problem

also notice that the solution only has 1 parameter, all first order differential equation have only one parameter in the solution.
 
  • #10
Why use an integrating factor? The ODE's clearly separable...
 
  • #11
Why use separation of variables?
You can clearly use an integrating factor..:smile:

It's just a matter of preference what method you use.
 
  • #12
hmm it doesn't appear to be seperable.

if you note its of the form dv/dt +Bv=C

as somebody else mentioned, that is not a seperable equation
 
  • #13
So, you disagree that the diff.eq may be rewritten as:
[tex]\frac{1}{C-Bv}\frac{dv}{dt}=1[/tex] ??
 
  • #14
oh my mistake, didn't see that manipulation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K