A skier starts from a hill 1000m high

  • Thread starter Thread starter unholymist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hill
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A skier descends from a 1000m high hill, covering 800m down the slope and 700m horizontally. The discussion focuses on calculating her velocity at the tree and understanding the unreasonableness of the result. The calculations assume no friction and utilize trigonometry to determine acceleration along the slope. The conclusion emphasizes that the high velocity calculated does not account for real-world factors such as friction and air resistance, which would significantly limit the skier's speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts: Energy, Motion, and Forces
  • Knowledge of trigonometry for slope calculations
  • Familiarity with equations of motion in physics
  • Ability to analyze real-world factors affecting motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of friction on motion in physics
  • Learn about air resistance and its impact on velocity
  • Explore advanced equations of motion in varying conditions
  • Investigate energy conservation principles in skiing scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for practical examples of motion and energy conservation in real-world applications.

unholymist
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A skier starts from a hill 1000m high...

Homework Statement



A skier starts from a hill 1000m high. She skies down the slope a distance of 800m and passes a tree. During this time she has covered a horizontal distance of 700m.

a) Calculate her velocity, in km/h, as she passes the tree.
b) Explain why this is such an unreasonable answer.

Homework Equations



Energy, Motion, Forces as far as I know.

The Attempt at a Solution



http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4481894/%234%20attempt%201058.jpg

That's what I've done so far. I basically assumed no friction and, using trigonometry, solved for her acceleration parallel to the slope. Then, using the equations of motion, I solved for her final velocity parallel to the slope. Whether that was done correctly I am not sure of. However, I am stuck trying to find mass. In part B it asks to explain why that velocity is so unreasonable. I'm thinking it's because it would imply that her mass is quite huge... but I can't prove it with a number, lol.

Anyone want to help? :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


unholymist said:
That's what I've done so far. I basically assumed no friction and, using trigonometry, solved for her acceleration parallel to the slope. Then, using the equations of motion, I solved for her final velocity parallel to the slope. Whether that was done correctly I am not sure of.
Looks good to me.
However, I am stuck trying to find mass.
Why are you trying to find the mass? (You won't be able to, given the information you have.)
In part B it asks to explain why that velocity is so unreasonable. I'm thinking it's because it would imply that her mass is quite huge... but I can't prove it with a number, lol.
Part B is a bit vague. I assume they want you to explain why such a high speed is not reasonable. What additional factors that you have neglected would limit the speed of a skiier?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K