MHB A Surjective function from [0,1]\{1/2} to [0,1]

Ella1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello guys! I'm taking Discrete Mathematics this semester and I got this question in one of my homework tasks.
I've tried thinking about the solution over and over but can't seem to come up with anything..
The question goes like this: Is there a Surjective function from [0,1]\{1/2} to [0,1] such that if f(a)>f(b) that means that a>b?
I must mention that sadly I cannot use any arguments involving cardinality..
Any clue that might help will save my life!p.s Sorry for my poor English :)!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ella said:
Hello guys! I'm taking Discrete Mathematics this semester and I got this question in one of my homework tasks.
I've tried thinking about the solution over and over but can't seem to come up with anything..
The question goes like this: Is there a Surjective function from [0,1]\{1/2} to [0,1] such that if f(a)>f(b) that means that a>b?
Hi Ella, and welcome to MHB!

Suppose that $(x_n)$ is an increasing sequence in $[0,1/2)$, with $\lim_{n\to\infty}x_n = 1/2.$ What can you say about the point $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(x_n)$? Can it be in the range of $f$?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top