A technical question that has to do with Hodge Star

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PhyAmateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the manipulation of the Hodge star operator in the context of complex matrices, specifically $$M_{IJ}$$. Participants debate whether the real part of a complex matrix, $$ReM_{IJ}$$, can be moved inside the Hodge star operator when multiplying by $$H$$, which is defined as $$H=Y$$, where $$Y=\star(...)$$. The consensus indicates that while the Hodge star is a linear map, the behavior changes when dealing with complex functions, necessitating careful consideration of conjugate-linear mappings. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the implications of these mappings in complex geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hodge star operator in R^3
  • Familiarity with complex matrices and their properties
  • Knowledge of linear and conjugate-linear mappings
  • Basic principles of differential forms and Hermitian products
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Hodge star operator in complex geometry
  • Learn about linear and conjugate-linear mappings in mathematical contexts
  • Explore Nakahara's book for a comprehensive understanding of differential geometry
  • Investigate the implications of Hermitian products on compact complex manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students in advanced geometry or algebra courses, particularly those focusing on complex analysis and differential forms.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
If we have an equation that looks like $$H=Y$$ and we want to multiply H by either $$ReM_{IJ}$$ or $$ImM_{IJ}$$ where $$M_{IJ}$$ is a complex matrix. But the thing is that $$Y=\star(...)$$ where $$\star$$ is hodge star and (...) is set of complex functions and other numerical stuff, my question is technical here, say we decide to multiply H by $$ReM_{IJ}$$ can we move $$ReM_{IJ}$$ into the parenthesis and jump over the Hodge star? That is to say $$ReM_{IJ}H=\star(ReM_{IJ} ...)$$ or this is absolutely wrong and we should keep $$ReN_{IJ}$$ outside the Hodge star? That is to say $$ReM_{IJ}H=ReM_{IJ}\star( ...)$$

EDIT: M_{IJ} is a complex matrix
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's your definition of the Hodge Star in this context?
 
Hodge star in R^3.
 
The Hodge star is a linear map. Careful though, in complex geometry sometimes the Hodge star is a conjugate-linear map. Hence the reason for the question.

P.S. Your posts would be way easier to read if you use in-line Latex where appropriate.
 
What do you mean here by conjugate-linear map? Let me be more specific with my question, do you mean if "c" is a real number or real function then
$$ \star(c\omega)=(c\star \omega)$$
If so, then what will happen if c were a complex function instead?

Note: I am trying to using a single "$" for in-line Latex with no results :(!
 
Actually, I think the conjugate-linear version is typically written ##\bar \star##. It means the combination of taking the Hodge dual and the complex conjugate. Hence for a complex number ##c##,

$$\bar \star \; c \omega = \bar c \; \bar \star \; \omega.$$

As for why you would want to do this: it allows you to define a natural Hermitian product on compact complex manifolds:

$$\langle \alpha, \, \beta \rangle = \int_M \alpha \wedge \bar \star \, \beta.$$

On PF, use ## for in-line Latex.
 
Oh great, I understand now, then for a linear map ##\star## and if ##c## is a complex function then it will not affect the complex function upon leaping it over the ##\star##

That is to say, is the following correct if the c is a complex function:

$$\star(c\omega)=c\star\omega$$

Thank you for the in-line tip, much neater! And if you may suggest for me a good read about those mappings (linear and complex conjugate) I'd be grateful!
 
You should read Nakahara's book.
 
Ok thank you, but about the last thing I mentioned about the complex function in my previous comment? I would appreciate if you reread my previous comment again? Does the complex function leap over the linear Hodge dual with no problem the same as if it were a real function?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
29K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K