'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schlofster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
Lawrence Krauss argues that the universe is flat and potentially infinite in spatial extent, which raises questions about its relationship with the Big Bang. The discussion highlights confusion over how an infinite universe can have a finite mass, particularly since empty space is thought to contribute significantly to that mass. Some participants express skepticism about Krauss's claims, suggesting they are more philosophical than empirical, and caution against interpreting his popular talks as rigorous science. The conversation also touches on the challenges of communicating complex cosmological concepts to a general audience, emphasizing the need for clarity in scientific discourse. Overall, the thread reflects a mix of intrigue and concern regarding the implications of Krauss's assertions on public understanding of cosmology.

Is Lawrence Krauss right about the universe being flat?


  • Total voters
    28
  • #61
Chalnoth said:
No, not at all! It's just what we expect to happen everywhere from time to time.

So universes give rise to other universes. Do the laws of physics remain the same. Are these new universes essentially clones?

Well, from our perspective, it looks like a microscopic black hole that almost instantly evaporates. But inside this microscopic black hole, the space-time becomes sort of twisted enough that a piece of it pinches off and expands on its own, independent of our universe.

Would this be common sense speculation? After all the entire idea that our Universe is a special virtual particle is highly speculative to begin with.

What evidence or reasoning is there that supports this concept?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #62
revo74 said:
What evidence or reasoning is there that supports this concept?

None other than some math as far as I know. Similar to other different multiverse ideas.
 
  • #63
revo74 said:
So universes give rise to other universes. Do the laws of physics remain the same. Are these new universes essentially clones?
Right now we don't have enough evidence to say for sure, but the general expectation is that the laws can be quite different every time.

revo74 said:
Would this be common sense speculation? After all the entire idea that our Universe is a special virtual particle is highly speculative to begin with.

What evidence or reasoning is there that supports this concept?
In general this sort of idea is very much at the frontier of knowledge. The models we have today seem to suggest that this kind of thing is possible, but it's very difficult to say what actually happens in this regime. So for the most part, this should be filed under, "Possible idea. Needs work."
 
  • #64
The universe can be flat and still be finite and unbounded.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
8K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
7K