About normalized D-velocity :uhh:

  • Thread starter Thread starter alfredblase
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "normalized D-velocity," particularly in the context of tensors such as u^\mu. Participants explore its meaning and implications, especially in higher-dimensional frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the definition of normalized D-velocity and its relation to dimensionality. There is a reference to a specific equation in string theory literature, which some participants use to clarify their understanding.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights and references that help clarify the concept of normalized D-velocity. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's learning process, with indications that the discussion is fostering a deeper understanding of the topic.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes the connection to string theory and the conventions used in the metric, suggesting that the discussion may involve specific assumptions related to the context of the problem.

alfredblase
Messages
228
Reaction score
0
what is meant by the expression "the normalized D-velocity"?

specifically when it is a tensor like [tex]u^\mu[/tex]

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you're looking at something dealing with more than 4 dimensions? I think this just refers to a d-dimensional velocity vector which has been normalized to length one, you can think of it as a unit vector pointing along the particle's world line.
 
From a google search of "normalized D-velocity",
one finds eq (1.2.4) in Polchinski's string theory book
[tex]u^\mu=\dot X^\mu (-\dot X^\nu \dot X_\nu)^{-1/2}[/tex]
...in agreement with dicerandom's comment. (The idea is not specific to string theory, of course. The minus arises from the choice of convention for the Lorentz-signature of the metric.)
 
Last edited:
hehehe, that is precisely the book I am reading and the quote was taken precisely from that page xDD. its just that I had never come across that expression before. I should have guessed what the phrase meant, as it is actually quite obvious. Well reading this book is very good physics training for me =) thanks guys. Ill get better and better I´m sure heh, but IT will get harder and harder haha, who will win?... emmm, oops xD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K