When chracterizing the definition of unique factorization domain ring, the Hungerford's text, for example, states that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

UFD1 any nonzero nonunit element x is written as x=c_1. . .c_n.

Does this mean any nonzero nonunit element is always written as a product of finitely many irreducible elements?

I think it is not the case. Because if it were then it implies that any R has finitely many irreducible elements.

So is it just for convenience's sake? So even if a nonzero nonunit element is a product of infinitely many irreducible elements, we can just put it as x=c_1. . .c_n? Even if it is uncountably infinitely many?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About the number of irreducible elements in UFD ring

Loading...

Similar Threads - number irreducible elements | Date |
---|---|

A Last Gauss Lemma Section II | Feb 4, 2018 |

B Why does every subfield of Complex number have a copy of Q? | Jun 11, 2017 |

I Similar Polygons | May 11, 2017 |

I Irreducibles and Primes in Integral Domains ... | Apr 5, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**