This pertains to the quantum mechanics of angular momentum, so I'll ask it here:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If operators A and B commute, does it follow that

(i.)allof A's eigenvectors are eigenvectors of B and vice versa,

or that

(ii.) merely some of them are?

According to Gillespie (see below) the commutivity of A and B implies that they "possess a common eigenbasis" (and the converse) and his proof seems to imply (i.), but it assumes that the operators are non-degenerate, and I don't know if the angular momentum operators are. Also, if (i.) and its converse are true, then it would seem to me that if A and B commute and A and C commute, then B and C would also commute, and I know that that's not supposed to be true. Nevertheless, so far I haven't found anyone explicitly say that (ii.) is the case.

The book is "A Quantum Mechanics Primer" by Daniel T. Gillespie, 1970.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# About the significance of commutivity

Loading...

Similar Threads - significance commutivity | Date |
---|---|

Significance of commutation of operators? position and momentum | Aug 16, 2012 |

Significance of ((H,x),x) double commutator? | Sep 27, 2010 |

Significance of Commutation Relations | Mar 14, 2010 |

The significance of commutation | Jun 23, 2009 |

Significance of the hamiltonian commuting | Oct 9, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**