Commutation Problem: Eigenvectors, Basis & Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Thread starter Diracobama2181
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Commutation Problem involving operators \(B_i\) and the Hamiltonian \(H\). It establishes that if each eigenvector \(|a_n\rangle\) of \(H\) is also an eigenvector of \(B_i\), then \(B_i\) and \(B_j\) must commute, leading to the conclusion that they share the same basis. However, the conversation also highlights the complexity introduced by degenerate energy states, particularly with angular momentum operators \(L_i\), where \( [L_i, H] = 0 \) does not guarantee \( [L_i, L_j] = 0 \) for \(i \neq j\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and operator theory
  • Familiarity with eigenvectors and eigenvalues
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonians and their properties
  • Basic grasp of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formalism of eigenvectors and their relationship with operators
  • Learn about the implications of degenerate energy states in quantum systems
  • Explore the properties of angular momentum operators and their commutation relations
  • Investigate the mathematical proof of commutation for operators in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers exploring operator theory and commutation relations in quantum systems.

Diracobama2181
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Consider a finite set of operators $B_i$
Let H be a Hamiltonian which commutes with each Bi;
i.e., [H, Bi] = 0 for all i. Suppose the |a_n> 's form a complete set of eigenstates of H satisfying
H|a_n>= a_n|a_n>.
(a) Let us choose one particular value of i and one particular value of n. Under what
circumstances can it be deduced that Bi|a_n> is proportional to |a_n>?
(b) Show that if the above is true for all i and for all n, then [B_i, B_j] = 0 for all i, j.
(c) How can you reconcile the rule stated in part (b) with the fact that for angular momentum
operators L_i, we can have a situation where [Li, H] = 0 but [Li, Lj] \= 0 when i \= j.
Relevant Equations
H|a_n>=a_n|a_n>
a) This would be true whenever |a_n> is an eigenvector of B_i.
b) If this holds true for each eigenvector, then B_i and B_j must share the same basis. Therefore, they must commute. Is this reasoning correct?
C) Despite commuting with the hamiltonian. the energy states can be degenerate, which I believe would imply that Li and Lj does not commute. Not sure how to mathematically formalize this though.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Diracobama2181 said:
a) This would be true whenever |a_n> is an eigenvector of B_i.
The point of this part of the question is to figure out what has to be true so you can conclude that ##\lvert a_n \rangle## is an eigenvector of ##B_i##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Diracobama2181
Diracobama2181 said:
Homework Statement:: Consider a finite set of operators $B_i$
Let H be a Hamiltonian which commutes with each Bi;
i.e., [H, Bi] = 0 for all i. Suppose the |a_n> 's form a complete set of eigenstates of H satisfying
H|a_n>= a_n|a_n>.
(a) Let us choose one particular value of i and one particular value of n. Under what
circumstances can it be deduced that Bi|a_n> is proportional to |a_n>?
(b) Show that if the above is true for all i and for all n, then [B_i, B_j] = 0 for all i, j.
(c) How can you reconcile the rule stated in part (b) with the fact that for angular momentum
operators L_i, we can have a situation where [Li, H] = 0 but [Li, Lj] \= 0 when i \= j.
Homework Equations:: H|a_n>=a_n|a_n>

a) This would be true whenever |a_n> is an eigenvector of B_i.
b) If this holds true for each eigenvector, then B_i and B_j must share the same basis. Therefore, they must commute. Is this reasoning correct?
C) Despite commuting with the hamiltonian. the energy states can be degenerate, which I believe would imply that Li and Lj does not commute. Not sure how to mathematically formalize this though.

You need to do more maths for these answers. For example, for part b) you need to show that for any state (vector) ##\psi## we have ##B_iB_j (\psi) = B_jB_i(\psi)##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K