I About time-independent non-degenerate perturbation expansion

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ishika_96_sparkles
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the perturbation expansion of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the nature of the state vector expansions. It clarifies that the terms ##\psi_a^i## in the expansion represent corrections to the unperturbed eigenstate ##\psi_a^0##, which become increasingly similar to the eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian. These correction terms can be expressed in terms of a basis set, typically the eigenstates of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. The conversation emphasizes the importance of differentiating between the single state being expanded and the basis set used for the expansion. Overall, the participants aim to deepen their understanding of perturbation theory and its foundational concepts.
Ishika_96_sparkles
Messages
57
Reaction score
22
TL;DR
Confusion regarding the state vector expansion over a set of basis functions and the perturbative expansion in the powers of $lambda$.
We know that any state vector in Hilbert space can be expanded as
$$ \Psi = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_i \psi_i $$

However, when we start the perturbation expansion of the eigenvalues and the eigenfunctions as
$$E_a = \lambda^0 E_a^0+\lambda^1 E_a^1+\lambda^2 E_a^2+\lambda^3 E_a^3+...+\lambda^n E_a^n+...$$
and
$$\psi_a = \lambda^0 \psi_a^0+\lambda^1 \psi_a^1+\lambda^2 \psi_a^2+\lambda^3 \psi_a^3+...+\lambda^n \Psi_a^n+...$$
respectively, is it the single state being expanded over its basis set or what? What exactly is this set ##{\psi_a^i}_{i=1}^n##?
How should I differentiate between the two?

PS: If my question is not clear, then please help me refine it as I really want to understand the basics of perturbation theory.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To reduce confusion, don't reuse the same symbols. For instance, consider
$$ \Psi = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \alpha_i \phi_i $$
where the ##\{ \phi_i \}## form some basis.

Then, in
Ishika_96_sparkles said:
$$\psi_a = \lambda^0 \psi_a^0+\lambda^1 \psi_a^1+\lambda^2 \psi_a^2+\lambda^3 \psi_a^3+...+\lambda^n \Psi_a^n+...$$
##\psi_a^0## would usually be an eigenstate of the unperturbed Hamiltonian ##\hat{H}_0##, and the other ##\psi_a^i## more generic functions (such that ##\psi_a## looks more and more like an eigenstate of the full Hamiltonian).

All the ##\psi_a^i## could be expressed in terms of basis states ##\{ \phi_i \}## (which would typically be the eigenstates of ##\hat{H}_0##, but could also be the eigenstates of the full Hamiltonian, or any other basis functions).
 
  • Care
Likes Ishika_96_sparkles
Thank you @DrClaude! for a clear writeup and reply.
DrClaude said:
ψai more generic functions (such that ψa looks more and more like an eigenstate of the full Hamiltonian).
which probably are the "first-order... second-order...correction" terms that modify the unperturbed eigenfunction to match the eigenfunction of the full Hamiltonian. did i get that right?

Furthermore, all the ##\psi_a^i## are expandable in the original basis set ##\{\phi_i\}##.
 
Ishika_96_sparkles said:
Thank you @DrClaude! for a clear writeup and reply.

which probably are the "first-order... second-order...correction" terms that modify the unperturbed eigenfunction to match the eigenfunction of the full Hamiltonian. did i get that right?

Furthermore, all the ##\psi_a^i## are expandable in the original basis set ##\{\phi_i\}##.
Correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Ishika_96_sparkles
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads