AC power loss in lossy dielectric (capacitor) with DC-bias field

AI Thread Summary
In a lossy dielectric capacitor with a constant permittivity and loss tangent, the energy loss during charging is influenced by both the dielectric properties and the equivalent series resistance (ESR) of the conductors. The discussion highlights that while the loss tangent indicates the fraction of energy dissipated, the energy loss during voltage transitions may not scale linearly as expected due to the behavior of ESR. Specifically, the energy loss for charging from 1V to 2V is debated, with some suggesting it should be three times that of charging from 0V to 1V, while others argue that simulations using ESR yield consistent energy loss across transitions. Additionally, the role of DC bias in relation to AC signals is questioned, suggesting that the focus may be misdirected. Overall, the complexities of dielectric loss and conductor resistance are central to understanding energy dissipation in these capacitors.
Ohm113
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
In a lossy dielectric with constant eps and tanD, does the energy loss increase with dc-bias while keeping the ac voltage and frequency constant?
Hi there,

if a dielectric (capacitor) is described with a constant permittivit eps (or C) and loss-tangent DF, how much energy ist lost when charging the capacitor by 1V?

For example: C=1, DF=0.1.
When charging from 0 to 1V, the lost energy (in J) is ...?
When charging from 1V to 2V, the lost energy (in J) is?

Since DF is the fraction of dissipation to stored energy, I would say the lost energy for the 1->2 transition is 3x that of the 0->1 transition. However, if a ESR equivalent resitance is calculated using ESR=DF*omega*C and that is used in a circuit simulator, the energy loss is the same for both transitions. However, the ESR approach might only be possible for pure AC signals without bias and also with a constant sinus shape. Looking forward for your discussions!

Thanks, Ohm
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Ohm113 said:
Summary:: In a lossy dielectric with constant eps and tanD,

Sorry, what is "eps"?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.
Sorry, what is "eps"?
I did a google search on "dielectric constant eps" and this is what I found, for what it's worth:

Eps=x Specifies the static (or zero-frequency) dielectric constant of the solvent. EpsInf=x Specifies the dynamic (or optical) dielectric constant of the solvent. For SMD calculations, it should be set to the square of the solvent's refractive index at 293 K.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and jim mcnamara
Ohm113 said:
Summary:: In a lossy dielectric with constant eps and tanD, does the energy loss increase with dc-bias while keeping the ac voltage and frequency constant?
It seems to me that this question is over-constrained, by focus on the dielectric.

It is not the dielectric loss that is important in tanD.
It is loss in the ESR of the thin foil conductors.

It is the changing capacitor voltage that generates heat in the ESR.
The DC zero or bias voltage is not important.

How can the DC bias be changed while having a zero AC component?
Surely that must be an AC voltage change.
 
Baluncore said:
It seems to me that this question is over-constrained, by focus on the dielectric.

It is not the dielectric loss that is important in tanD.
It is loss in the ESR of the thin foil conductors.
Figure 4 in this Murata document: https://article.murata.com/en-us/article/impedance-esr-frequency-characteristics-in-capacitors

shows that dielectric loss is responsible for a substantial part of the loss at frequencies below the self resonant frequency:

ESR Chart.png
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top