Ohmic Losses In Capacitor Discharge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of ohmic losses in capacitor discharge, specifically comparing two configurations of capacitors: a bank of ten parallel capacitors versus a single large capacitor. Participants explore the implications of equivalent series resistance (ESR) on energy efficiency and current discharge characteristics, with a focus on theoretical and practical applications in high-current scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that while the ten capacitors have a higher ESR individually, their combined effect when discharged in parallel could yield the same total ESR as the single large capacitor, leading to similar energy losses.
  • Another participant clarifies that the ESRs are not in parallel but in series with each capacitor, asserting that the total current and power loss would effectively be the same for both configurations.
  • Some participants express confusion about how adding capacitors in parallel decreases total resistance, comparing it to complex phenomena.
  • A participant raises concerns about the current ratings of the capacitors and the potential power dissipation during discharge, indicating the need for careful consideration of component specifications.
  • One participant proposes using an SCR for each capacitor in the ten-capacitor bank, questioning the feasibility of using SCRs rated for much lower currents for short-duration pulses.
  • Another participant discusses the power loss calculations in relation to the total current and ESR, providing a mathematical perspective on the energy dissipation in the system.
  • A participant inquires about the specifications of an SCR they found online, questioning whether it can be classified as an SCR based on its design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants agree on the equivalence of power loss between the two capacitor configurations, there remains uncertainty and confusion regarding the implications of ESR and the practical limits of the components involved. The discussion does not reach a consensus on all points raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the behavior of capacitors in parallel and the implications for ESR. There are unresolved questions about the ratings and specifications of components used in high-current applications.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in high-current capacitor applications, power electronics, and those exploring the effects of ESR on energy efficiency in capacitor discharge systems may find this discussion relevant.

axi0m
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Let's say that we have two capacitive sources of power:

1) ten parallel 450V 1800uF 138.8mOhm-ESR capacitors​

2) one 450V 18000uF 13.88mOhm-ESR capacitor​

Both sources contain 1,823J of energy. The source containing ten capacitors is advantageous for my purposes due to the fact that the capacitors can be discharged at set intervals, thus creating a longer, lower current pulse than the one large capacitor. My main priority is overall system efficiency.

The disadvantage with lower-capacitance capacitors is that they have a much higher equivalent series resistance (ESR.) Being that resistance in a circiut dissipates power, thus wasting energy, I would expect, in my mediocre electrical knowledge, that the source containing ten high-ESR capcitors would waste more energy than the other, thus leading to lower overall system efficiency.

However, my source of confusion is the fact that if all ten capacitors from the first source were placed in parallel and discharged simultaneously, the total resistance would be given by the equation below, which dictates total resistance of resistors in parallel, in this case, the ESR of the ten capacitors:

resistrs.gif


By this equation, the total ESR of all ten capacitors connected in parallel would be 13.88mOhms, the same ESR as the one large capacitor. Is it true that if all ten capacitors from source one were discharged not simultaneously, but in very close intervals, the total energy lost due to ohmics losses would be the same as in source two, the one large capacitor?

As always, thanks in advance for your help -- it's much appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The ESRs are not in parallel. They are in series with a capacitor and the combinations are in parallel.
However the effect is the same. Each of the smaller capacitors would discharge at 3242 amps
(450 / .1388) initially.
The large capacitor would discharge at 32420 Amps.

So, yes, the total current would be the same and the resistance is effectively the same, so the power loss is the same.
 
Last edited:
Yes.
 
vk6kro said:
Yes.

Haha, I checked your first reply from my phone and somehow overlooked the end of your post where you said power loss would be the same. Then by the time I saw it and deleted my post, you already replied. You're good! ;-)edit:
I see now you edited it. Sneaky sneaky...
 
Yes, I extended the comment a bit. Stating the obvious, I suppose.

These are serious currents, though. Are you sure these capacitors are rated for such currents?

The large capacitor would be dissipating 14 589 000 watts if only briefly.
 
vk6kro said:
Yes, I extended the comment a bit. Stating the obvious, I suppose.

I'm just having a hard time conceptualizing how adding more capacitors in parallel decreases total resistance, or ESR. It seems like some kind of double-slit photon experiment.


vk6kro said:
These are serious currents, though. Are you sure these capacitors are rated for such currents?

The large capacitor would be dissipating 14 589 000 watts if only briefly.

Yes, pretty sure. Aluminum electrolytic capacitors are used quite frequently for fast-discharge experiments including various electromagnetic launchers. I've even read about a representitive from Cornell-Dubilier that discussed using the same type of capacitor for 40kA+ discharge experiments -- from a single capacitor.
 
On a very related topic, I have another question.

I'm thinking of using the ten-capacitor bank with an SCR on each capacitor. Each SCR would be controlled by some kind of microprocessor or IC and could be fired at any given interval.

It appears that each capacitor will discharge at around 3kA+. Obviously, an SCR that is listed at this current would be well outside of a reasonable budget. I'm thinking that for such a short pulse duration, an SCR could handle around 10x its normal current limit -- does that seem reasonable? Thus, I could find one that's closer to 300A.
 
axi0m said:
I'm just having a hard time conceptualizing how adding more capacitors in parallel decreases total resistance, or ESR. It seems like some kind of double-slit photon experiment..
Suppose the total sum current is I, and the ESR is R ohms for each of 10 capacitors. Then the power loss in each ESR is (0.1 I)2 R = 0.01 I2 R. So the sum of the losses in 10 capacitors is 0.1 I2 R, or I2 R/10.
 
Quick question -- I'm interested in http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=260442854571&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT" to switch power for the capacitors. It says SCR, however, I don't see a wire or even a terminal for the gate. I asked the seller about it, if it was really an "SCR", the person said simply that they didn't know.

Could this be anything but an SCR? ...being that it doesn't have another wire or visible terminal. I'm assuming the terminal for the gate is on the other side or something.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K