Accelerating Universe Expansion: Big Bang or Repulsive Force?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chalk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Expansion
Chalk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I recently read that there is apparently a repulsive force that acts over very long distances that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. I was just wondering if there is any data that disprove the possibility that the big bang was not a singular event and that rather than being driven away by a repulsive force, the matter at the edge of the observable universe might not be getting drawn towards matter that is still farther away that had its origins in a preceding big bang. Is there some reason that we know this is not possible?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I was just wondering if there is any data that disprove the possibility that the big bang was not a singular event and that rather than being driven away by a repulsive force, the matter at the edge of the observable universe might not be getting drawn towards matter that is still farther away that had its origins in a preceding big bang. Is there some reason that we know this is not possible?

No guarantee that the big bang and inflation even happened... just a theory with a lot of supporting evidence that appears to confirm the theory. I've never seen a plausible nor implausiable theory that matches your hypothesis...
 
Chalk said:
I recently read that there is apparently a repulsive force that acts over very long distances that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. I was just wondering if there is any data that disprove the possibility that the big bang was not a singular event and that rather than being driven away by a repulsive force, the matter at the edge of the observable universe might not be getting drawn towards matter that is still farther away that had its origins in a preceding big bang. Is there some reason that we know this is not possible?
This has been looked into, and the implications are, frankly, absurd. It requires that we have a local underdensity by a factor of about a hundred from the surroundings compared to stuff just a few billion light years out.
Here's a recent paper that looked into this:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/0902.1313
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K