Accelerating Universe Expansion: Big Bang or Repulsive Force?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Chalk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating Expansion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that a repulsive force is responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe, challenging the traditional Big Bang theory. Participants highlight that while the Big Bang theory has substantial supporting evidence, alternative theories lack plausibility and empirical support. A significant point raised is the absurdity of requiring a local underdensity by a factor of about one hundred to support the idea of a preceding Big Bang. A relevant paper addressing these concepts is available at this link.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bang theory and its implications
  • Familiarity with concepts of cosmic expansion and dark energy
  • Knowledge of astrophysical terms such as "local underdensity" and "observable universe"
  • Basic comprehension of scientific research methodologies and paper analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Read the paper titled "0902.1313" for in-depth analysis of cosmic expansion theories
  • Explore the concept of dark energy and its role in universe expansion
  • Investigate alternative cosmological models beyond the Big Bang theory
  • Study the implications of local underdensity in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics enthusiasts interested in the dynamics of the universe's expansion and the validity of the Big Bang theory.

Chalk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I recently read that there is apparently a repulsive force that acts over very long distances that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. I was just wondering if there is any data that disprove the possibility that the big bang was not a singular event and that rather than being driven away by a repulsive force, the matter at the edge of the observable universe might not be getting drawn towards matter that is still farther away that had its origins in a preceding big bang. Is there some reason that we know this is not possible?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I was just wondering if there is any data that disprove the possibility that the big bang was not a singular event and that rather than being driven away by a repulsive force, the matter at the edge of the observable universe might not be getting drawn towards matter that is still farther away that had its origins in a preceding big bang. Is there some reason that we know this is not possible?

No guarantee that the big bang and inflation even happened... just a theory with a lot of supporting evidence that appears to confirm the theory. I've never seen a plausible nor implausiable theory that matches your hypothesis...
 
Chalk said:
I recently read that there is apparently a repulsive force that acts over very long distances that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. I was just wondering if there is any data that disprove the possibility that the big bang was not a singular event and that rather than being driven away by a repulsive force, the matter at the edge of the observable universe might not be getting drawn towards matter that is still farther away that had its origins in a preceding big bang. Is there some reason that we know this is not possible?
This has been looked into, and the implications are, frankly, absurd. It requires that we have a local underdensity by a factor of about a hundred from the surroundings compared to stuff just a few billion light years out.
Here's a recent paper that looked into this:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/0902.1313
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K