Activation energy of Silicon Dioxide thermite reaction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the activation energy of the thermite reaction between silicon dioxide and aluminum, specifically in the context of the Goldschmidt process. Participants explore the energy dynamics of the reaction, including the energy yield and the role of additives like sulfur.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine the activation energy of the silicon dioxide and aluminum reaction, expressing interest in the difference between energy produced and energy required to sustain the reaction.
  • There is a mention of the necessity of sulfur as an additive to boost the energy yield, with a request for clarification on its thermodynamic necessity.
  • Some participants suggest consulting literature and handbooks for data, indicating a reliance on existing research for information.
  • There is a light-hearted exchange regarding the concept of a library, with clarification provided about the type of library relevant to scientific research.
  • Another participant references a specific article in the Journal of Materials Science that may contain relevant information.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not reach a consensus on the activation energy or the necessity of sulfur in the reaction. Participants express differing views on how to obtain data and the nature of libraries, indicating a lack of agreement on the best approach to gather information.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not provide specific data or references regarding the activation energy or the thermodynamic implications of sulfur's role, leaving these aspects unresolved.

wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
I am not asking how to make this reaction. Please do not lock this thread just because it happens to contain the word "thermite". I am simply asking for information about this process for research involving silica.

The Goldshmidt process between silicon dioxide and aluminum is expressed by the equation:

http://amazingrust.com/Experiments/how_to/Images/Reaction10_a.gif

I have used a table of standard enthalpies of formation to determine the energy yield per mole of the bare reaction. My question is how can I determine the activation energy of this reaction? Please do not direct me to the Arrhenius rate equation unless you have rate information.

I am mainly interested in the difference between the energy produced per mole and the energy required to sustain the reaction per mole. This reaction is often "boosted" by adding sulfur to the mixture to increase the energy yield through side reactions with the aluminum. I am curious as to why this is necessary, and if it would be thermodynamically possible to carry out the reaction without the use of additives like sulfur.

Any additional information regarding the specific reasons why sulfur addition is necessary would be appreciated.

Thank you in advance for any responses!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I can't think of any other way of getting the data then checking literature and handbooks (that is, visiting library).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What is this "Library" you speak of? How do I do one?
 
You know, large rooms, shelves, books and librarian...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wil3 said:
What is this "Library" you speak of? How do I do one?

Borek said:
You know, large rooms, shelves, books and librarian...

There might be some confusion here, based on the two of you being from different countries.

wil3, Borek probably means a library found in and operated by the chemistry department of a university or other scientific research institution. If you were thinking of a public library that caters to the general public, then no that would be the wrong place to look.
 
Redbelly98 said:
wil3, Borek probably means a library found in and operated by the chemistry department of a university or other scientific research institution...

And while you are there, look for the following article

J. Materials Sci., Vol. 28, No. 14, pps. 3693-3708.

Smile for the cameras...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K