Activity of photon during wavelegnth duration

  • Thread starter Thread starter acesuv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Activity Photon
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of photons in relation to radio waves and their wavelengths. It clarifies that photons do not travel back and forth in unison with the wavelength, as commonly depicted in sinusoidal representations, which actually illustrate electric and magnetic field behaviors rather than photon motion. The relationship between classical electromagnetic fields and quantum photons is complex, and caution is advised when attempting to connect the two concepts. Energy calculations can bridge the gap, as electromagnetic radiation carries energy that can be quantified in terms of photons. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the nature of electromagnetic radiation and photon behavior.
acesuv
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
(disregard my improvised science lingo)

so like... a radio wave has a rather macroscopic wavelength. the photon is depicted as traveling back and forth in unison with the wavelength. I am having trouble understanding why the photon can't hit you from the "side". if the photon is traveling a zig-zaged path (zig zags due to wavelength), then is it possible for the photon to actually hit you from the "side"? if you get hit by a radiowave when its coming back down from its wavelength, it has some velocity in a direction which the light isn't actually travelling. I am thinking uncertainty principals somehow negate this? please help thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
acesuv said:
a radio wave has a rather macroscopic wavelength. the photon is depicted as traveling back and forth in unison with the wavelength.

No, it doesn't do that. Where have you seen this depicted?
 
jtbell said:
No, it doesn't do that. Where have you seen this depicted?

im not sure. i did a google image search and couldn't find any depictions of such, which discourages me.

thanks
 
The sinusoidal "pictures" that you usually see of electromagnetic waves are supposed to represent the behavior of classical electric and magnetic fields. They show the magnitude and direction of those fields at various points, at various times, not the motion of actual objects.

The relationship between classical electric and magnetic fields on one hand, and quantum-electrodynamical photons on the other hand, is rather complex and subtle. Unless you know QED well, it's dangerous to try to connect the two.

The safest way is via energy: classical electric and magnetic fields carry energy. A volume of space "filled" with electromagnetic radiation contains a certain amount of energy E, which we can calculate from classical electrodynamics in terms of the amplitudes of the electric and magnetic fields. Looking at this in terms of photons, each photon has energy hf. So if the radiation has a single frequency, then we can say the average number of photons in that volume is N = E / hf.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K