Adding CF4 to the Martian Atmosphere (terraforming)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential use of Carbon Tetrafluoride (CF4) in terraforming Mars, specifically focusing on its ability to raise the atmospheric pressure to levels that could support human activity without pressure suits. Participants explore the implications of introducing CF4 into the Martian atmosphere, including its stability, greenhouse gas properties, and potential interactions with other atmospheric components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that raising the Martian atmospheric pressure to around 250 millibars could be beneficial for human visitors, with CF4 being a potential contributor due to its stability and greenhouse gas properties.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the displacement of breathable oxygen by CF4 due to its heavier molecular weight, which could lead to atmospheric stratification at ground level.
  • One participant suggests that while CF4 would displace oxygen, the primary goal could be to achieve atmospheric pressure rather than a breathable atmosphere, necessitating the continued use of oxygen supplies.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for CF4 to interact with solar radiation, possibly creating free fluorine that could react with other atmospheric components, leading to harmful byproducts.
  • Another participant speculates on the possibility of using fluorine to liberate oxygen from iron oxides on Mars, proposing a chemical reaction that could yield both oxygen and CF4.
  • Some participants express a strong aversion to CF4, citing its potential hazards, while others argue it may be a preferable option compared to the current Martian atmosphere, which is primarily CO2.
  • Concerns are reiterated about the reactivity of fluorine and its potential to create dangerous conditions, although some note that CF4's carbon-fluorine bond is very stable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the safety and feasibility of using CF4 for terraforming Mars. While some see potential benefits, others express significant concerns about its implications and hazards.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the chemical behavior of CF4 and its interactions with the Martian environment, which remain unresolved. The feasibility of mining and introducing such large quantities of fluorine is also not fully addressed.

.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,904
Reaction score
1,957
There are several possible goals related to terraforming Mars. In the short term, Earthling visitors will need to stay indoors or venture out only in pressure suits. But there would be enormous convenience and safety benefits in raising the Martian atmospheric surface pressure from it current feeble average of about 6.1 millibars.

NASA literally wrote the book on human exposure to low atmospheric pressure (SP NASA-3006 - starting on page 6).

There is the Armstrong limit of 63 millibars. That's the vapor pressure of water at body temperature - and exposure to anything less than that results in very immediate problems.

A far more useful goal would be about 250 millibars - where normal blood oxygen levels can barely be maintained with pure oxygen and no pressure suit.

So, while reading about various green-house gases, I looked at CF4, Carbon Tetrafluoride. And my thought is that this could be a major contributor to improving the Martian climate by human standards.

CF4 is a pretty stable molecule, so I would guess that it would tolerate cosmic radiation fairly well and otherwise stick around for quite awhile in the Martian environment.

Compared to O2 and N2, CF4 is a pretty heavy molecule, so even in the weak Martian gravity hole and a solar wind unperturbed by a magnetic field, it would hang on longer. It would also "thin out" quicker as you gained altitude - coming closer to the Earthly rate of about 50% for every 18,000 feet.

It's a very potent green house gas - so things could get toasty.

And, except for the drowning hazard, it is non-toxic.

The surface area of Mars is 144.37 million Km2. For a goal of 250 millibars, you would need the fluorine to contribute about 216 millibars, 200 g/c^2, or 2x10^6 tonnes/Km^2. That works out to 2.89 10^14 metric tons of fluorine. So start mining.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buzz Bloom and Hornbein
Engineering news on Phys.org
Very interesting idea, though I'd have a couple of concerns. The first would be that such a high proportion of CF4 would potentially displace breathable O2 by atmospheric stratification at ground level given how much heavier it would be (molecular weight of ~88 as opposed to ~32 for O2, ~28 for N2, and ~44 for CO2). The second would be that CF4 interaction with unprotected solar radiation from the lack of a magnetic field could create free fluorine, which even in tiny amounts may react with atmospheric CO2, CO, O2, or even H2O to in turn create some rather nasty byproducts.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc and Klystron
It would definitely displace oxygen. The objective would only be to provide atmospheric pressure - not a breathable atmosphere. You would still need to carry oxygen. But you wouldn't need a pressure suit.

Carbonyl fluoride could be a problem, but it is only an irritant and would stay at higher altitudes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: InkTide
.Scott said:
It would definitely displace oxygen. The objective would only be to provide atmospheric pressure - not a breathable atmosphere. You would still need to carry oxygen. But you wouldn't need a pressure suit.

Carbonyl fluoride could be a problem, but it is only an irritant and would stay at higher altitudes.
Ah, I misread your intent then - for pressure it could definitely work.

I was thinking about the potential for surface reactions given fluorine's propensity to violently rip electrons away from other atoms, and it occurred to me that you could potentially in-situ liberate the oxygen in iron oxides all over Mars by exposing the surface minerals to fluorine - I believe the resulting products would be anhydrous iron(III) fluoride and pure oxygen gas, since fluorine is a stronger oxidizer than oxygen. You could use the resulting iron fluoride compound to bind to/filter water (it's extremely hygroscopic and very thermally stable) as both a heat source and a way to store water chemically to prevent evaporation and loss to the Martian atmosphere (followed presumably by loss to the solar wind). Using preexisting projects already used on Mars successfully, you could conceivably displace the oxygen from the second byproduct of the MOXIE device (CO) and yield... well, carbon tetrafluoride for your atmospheric pressure creation projects, plus even more oxygen.

One of the reasons fluorine is so dangerous on Earth is it energetically replaces oxygen compounds that are abundant and normally stable, effectively starting fires that produce pure oxygen gas as a byproduct... which go on to be exactly as reactive as oxygen gas is, plus a lot of energy dumped into the molecules by the fluorine reaction. On the plus side, fluorine compounds tend to be extraordinarily stable as a result... as long as it's not with another halogen or hydrogen (an honorary halogen more than it is an honorary alkali metal).
 
.Scott said:
CF4, Carbon Tetrafluoride
I wouldn't want any of that stuff around me; here or on Mars.
 
dlgoff said:
I wouldn't want any of that stuff around me; here or on Mars.
It would be easier to deal with than a near CO2 vacuum. It may be the best of workable options.
 
dlgoff said:
I wouldn't want any of that stuff around me; here or on Mars.
.Scott said:
It would be easier to deal with than a near CO2 vacuum. It may be the best of workable options.
Pretty much the only hazards are its reaction with alkali metals and the risk of asphyxiation. The carbon-fluorine bond is literally the strongest single bond in organic chemistry - about the only atmospheric gas that would be more inert would be... well, dinitrogen.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K