Addition of Central Control Rod in Small Modular Reactor Geometry Using Serpent

AI Thread Summary
To create a small modular reactor geometry in Serpent code, users need to define the reactor's geometry accurately, including the placement of a control rod at the center. It is essential to incorporate the correct code scripts in the geometry section to facilitate this setup. For a hexagonal lattice configuration, specific parameters must be adjusted to ensure proper representation of the reactor's structure. Users are encouraged to refer to Serpent documentation for guidance on scripting and geometry definitions. Proper implementation will enable accurate modeling of reactor behavior with the added control rod.
emilmammadzada
Messages
129
Reaction score
19
TL;DR Summary
Addition of Central Control Rod in Small Modular Reactor Geometry Using Serpent
Dear Experts I would like to create a small modular reactor-like geometry for Serpent code (example: ABV reactor). How can I add a control rod to the center like in the picture below? Which code scripts should I add in the geometry part. And how can I do this in Hexagonal laticce?
 

Attachments

  • Fuel-assembly-of-ABV-reactor-IAEA-International-Atomic-Energy-Agency-2007_Q320.jpg
    Fuel-assembly-of-ABV-reactor-IAEA-International-Atomic-Energy-Agency-2007_Q320.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 32
  • serpent-input.txt
    serpent-input.txt
    9.2 KB · Views: 32
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top