Addition of Complex Term in Lippmann Schwinger Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter richard wakefield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Complex Term
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
richard wakefield
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello PF People,

This is probably a very simple question but I don't really get it.

In Lippmann Schwinger Equation we add an infinitesimal term to the denominator in order to avoid singularity for when E is an eigenvalue of [itex]\hat{H}_0[/itex]. This is fine, but why it has to be a complex number? Adding a real constant will also save denominator from becoming singular. That confuses me.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody? It seemed to be a good question.

My point of view: I guess the reason is to avoid more singularities, as could be the case of continuous spectra. Knowing that the limit [itex]\epsilon \rightarrow 0[/itex] would be the same in all directions (imaginary, real or "mixed complex")

There are no complex energies in the spectrum, so, that should be "safer".
 
The eigenvalue spectrum of H0 is continuous, all real numbers E0 > 0. In order to give meaning to the inverse operator (E - H0)-1 it is necessary to avoid the entire positive real axis. The fact that we use +iε rather than -iε has to do with the outgoing boundary conditions.
 
Ahh, i forgot that was indeed the free hamiltonian, then seems obvious. I have my scattering theory rusty, damn it.