Addition of Complex Term in Lippmann Schwinger Equation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter richard wakefield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Complex Term
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the addition of a complex term in the Lippmann Schwinger Equation, specifically addressing the necessity of using a complex number to avoid singularities when the energy E is an eigenvalue of the operator \hat{H}_0. The scope includes theoretical considerations in quantum mechanics and scattering theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why a complex number is necessary in the Lippmann Schwinger Equation, suggesting that a real constant could also prevent singularities.
  • Another participant proposes that using a complex term may help avoid additional singularities associated with continuous spectra, noting that the limit as ε approaches 0 would be consistent across different directions in the complex plane.
  • A third participant clarifies that the eigenvalue spectrum of H0 is continuous and that using +iε is related to the outgoing boundary conditions, which is necessary to meaningfully define the inverse operator (E - H0)-1.
  • A later reply acknowledges a lapse in understanding related to the free Hamiltonian, indicating a personal reflection on the complexity of scattering theory.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and implications of using a complex term versus a real constant, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the continuous nature of the eigenvalue spectrum and the implications for defining operators, but do not fully resolve the mathematical nuances or assumptions regarding the choice of complex versus real terms.

richard wakefield
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello PF People,

This is probably a very simple question but I don't really get it.

In Lippmann Schwinger Equation we add an infinitesimal term to the denominator in order to avoid singularity for when E is an eigenvalue of \hat{H}_0. This is fine, but why it has to be a complex number? Adding a real constant will also save denominator from becoming singular. That confuses me.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody? It seemed to be a good question.

My point of view: I guess the reason is to avoid more singularities, as could be the case of continuous spectra. Knowing that the limit \epsilon \rightarrow 0 would be the same in all directions (imaginary, real or "mixed complex")

There are no complex energies in the spectrum, so, that should be "safer".
 
The eigenvalue spectrum of H0 is continuous, all real numbers E0 > 0. In order to give meaning to the inverse operator (E - H0)-1 it is necessary to avoid the entire positive real axis. The fact that we use +iε rather than -iε has to do with the outgoing boundary conditions.
 
Ahh, i forgot that was indeed the free hamiltonian, then seems obvious. I have my scattering theory rusty, damn it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
454