Additivity and $\sigma$-Additivity of a Measure on $\mathbb{N}$ with Example

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LHeiner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of additivity and $\sigma$-additivity of a measure defined on the set of natural numbers, $\mathbb{N}$. Participants explore the properties of a specific measure, $\mu(A)$, and provide examples, particularly focusing on cases where the measure may not be defined.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the measure $\mu(A)=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid _\mathbb{N} (A \cap [1,n])$ and asks for help verifying its additivity and $\sigma$-additivity.
  • Another participant claims that the additivity holds by applying the additivity of the counting measure and splitting the limit, while also suggesting that $\sigma$-additivity requires exchanging limit and series.
  • A specific example is provided where the measure $\mu$ may not exist, involving the set $\{n\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~n>0\}\cup \{2n+1/2~\vert~n>0\}$.
  • Concerns are raised about the measure not being $\sigma$-additive, particularly when considering countable unions of singletons.
  • Participants discuss the implications of exchanging limits and sums, with one providing conditions under which this exchange is valid.
  • Confusion arises regarding the measure of finite sets, with one participant suggesting that $\mu(A)$ might always be zero, which is challenged by another who calculates $\mu(\mathbb{N})$ to be 1.
  • Further confusion is expressed about the example set and why it does not yield a limit, with attempts to analyze the set based on even and odd elements.
  • Participants reference external examples and express uncertainty about the validity of their own examples.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the properties of the measure $\mu$, particularly regarding its $\sigma$-additivity and the existence of limits for specific sets. Multiple competing views and interpretations are present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the conditions under which limits can be exchanged with sums, and there are unresolved questions about the measure's behavior on specific sets.

LHeiner
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey

i'm given a measure on [tex]$\Omega =\mathbb{N}, A \subset \mathbb{N}$[/tex] and should check additivity as well as [tex]$\sigma$[/tex]-additiviy. Additionally i should give an example for a set where [tex]$\mu(A)$[/tex] is not defined:

[tex]$\mu(A)=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid _\mathbb{N} (A \cap [1,n])$[/tex] with finite limit.
whereas [tex]$\xi\mid _\mathbb{N}$[/tex] is the counting measure on [tex]$\mathbb{N}$[/tex]

Can anybody help me with this?
Appreciate it, thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the additivity

[tex]\mu(A\cup B) =\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\frac{1}{n}\xi_\mathbb{N}((A\cap [1,n])\cup(B\cap [1,n]))}[/tex]

Now just apply the additivity of the counting measure and split the limit.

For [tex]\sigma[/tex]-additivity, you will eventually need to exchange limit and series. But this should be no problem since the series has positive terms.

As for the example where [tex]\mu[/tex] does not exist. The only problem with [tex]\mu[/tex] might be that the limit does not exist. This happens with the following set
[tex]\{n\in \mathbb{N}~\vert~n>0\}\cup \{2n+1/2~\vert~n>0\}[/tex]

Just ask if something is not clear...

The measure [tex]\mu[/tex] can actually be regarded as the limiting average elements of a set. It also poses some interesting questions. Like: what is the measure of the primes? or what is the measure of the squares?
 
Ok that means:

[tex]$\mu (A\cup B)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N}(A\cap[1,n])\cup (B\cap[1,n]))=\\<br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} [(A\cap[1,n])+ (B\cap[1,n])]=\\<br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (A\cap[1,n])+\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (B\cap[1,n])=\mu(A)+\mu(B)$[/tex]

and [tex]$\sigma$[/tex]-add:

[tex]$\mu(\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}A_i)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}A_i \cap [1,n])\\<br /> =\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (\sum_{i=1}^{n}A_i \cap [1,n])\\<br /> =\sum_{i=1}^{n} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi\mid_\mathbb{N} (A_i \cap [1,n])= \sum \mu(A_i)$[/tex]

But i can't see why [tex]$\mu$[/tex] has no limit for the set [tex]${n \in \mathbb{N}\vert n>0}\cup \{2n+1/2\vert n>0}$[/tex]
 
The "measure" isn't sigma-additive, e.g. consider a countable union of singletons.
 
Hmm, in your proof of additivity, you say

[tex]\xi[(A\cap [1,n])+(B\cap[1,n])][/tex]

You can of course not take the sum of two sets. That needs to be

[tex]\xi(A\cap [1,n])+\xi(B\cap [1,n])[/tex]

As noticed by bpet, [tex]\mu[/tex] is not [tex]\sigma[/tex]-additive. The reason for this is, that you can not in general exchange limit with sum. This is sometimes allowed, but not in this case.

For convenience, I'll give two situations in which you CAN exchange limit with sum (notice that none of these two situations apply here).

We have that

[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{x_{n,k}}=\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_{n,k}}}[/tex]

if one of following situations occurs
1) [tex]\forall k: m\leq n~\Rightarrow~x_{m,k}\leq x_{n,k}[/tex] and every [tex]x_{n,k}[/tex] is positive.
2) There exists a sequence [tex](y_k)_k[/tex] such that [tex]\sum_{k=1}^{+\infty}{|y_k|}<+\infty[/tex] and [tex]\forall k,n: |x_{n,k}|\leq y_k[/tex]

You will prove these theorems later in it's ful generality (i.e. with integrals instead of sums).




Now for the set [tex]A=\{n \in \mathbb{N}\vert n>0\}\cup \{2n+(1/2)\vert n>0\}[/tex]. Just calculate for every n, how many elements are in [tex]A\cap[1,n][/tex]. (be sure to discriminate between the cases n is even/n is odd). Then divide this number by n and take the limit.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry now I am completely confused :confused::confused:

i think my problem is that maybe i don't completely understand the function at all. i mean isn't [tex]$\mu(A)$[/tex] always 0?

If i look at [tex]A\left \{1,2,5,8,9,10 \right \} \Rightarrow \mu(A)=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi (A \cap [1,n])= \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{n} \xi ({1,2,5,8,9,10})=\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \frac{6}{n}=0[/tex]

i think measure (&set) theory is not my speciality:frown:
 
Don't worry, everybody is confused in the beginning of measure theory. It grows on you.

But the measure [tex]\mu[/tex] is certainly not zero. For finite sets, it is zero. But let's calculate [tex]\mu(\mathbb{N})[/tex].

We have that [tex]\mathbb{N}\cap [1,n]=\{1,...,n\}[/tex]. So [tex]\xi(\mathbb{N}\cap [1,n])=n[/tex]. So

[tex]\frac{1}{n} \xi(\mathbb{N}\cap [1,n])= 1[/tex]

Taking the limit, yields that [tex]\mu(\mathbb{N})=1[/tex].
 
okey so i think i now get why the function is not [tex]\sigma[/tex] additive, because if you apply the function to sum of countable unions of singletons you don't get the same as if you sum up the function on each of the sets.
am i right?

so then i only have to figure out the last part the set for which there exists no limit
 
  • #10
Yes, you are right.
 
  • #11
still confused with this set, why is there no limit, even if i distinguish between odd/even i always get a countable set or where is my error?

n..even= 2k
[tex]A=\left \{2k\right \}\cup \left \{4k+0,5\right \}=\left \{2,4,4.5,6,8,8.5...\right \}\cap [1,n]\rightarrow \xi(..)=n[/tex]
n..odd=2k+1
[tex]A=\left \{2k+1\right \}\cup \left \{4k+1,5\right \}=\left \{1,3,5,5.5,7...\right \}\cap [1,n]\rightarrow \xi(..)=n[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K