Why is the adjoint of a bra-ket <φ|ψ>* = <ψ|φ>?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexis21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bra-ket
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
4 replies · 4K views
Alexis21
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

why is the adjoint of a bra-ket like this:

[itex]< \phi | \psi >^+ = < \psi | \phi >[/itex]

Is it a definition or can it be derived somehow?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The scalar product in a (pre-)Hilbert space is a sesquilinear form, i.e., by definition

[tex]\langle \psi|\phi \rangle = \langle \phi|\psi \rangle^*[/tex]

and

[tex]\langle \psi | \alpha \phi_1 + \beta \phi_2 \rangle = \alpha \langle \psi | \phi_1 \rangle + \beta \langle \psi | \phi_2 \rangle.[/tex]
 
When [itex]\langle\psi|\phi\rangle[/itex] denotes the inner product (or semi-inner product) of [itex]\psi[/itex] and [itex]\phi[/itex], what vanhees71 said is the complete answer. But if it denotes [itex]\langle\psi|[/itex] acting on [itex]|\phi\rangle[/itex], some elaboration is required. [itex]\langle\psi|[/itex] is defined as a function that takes kets to complex numbers. To be more specific, it's defined as the function such that takes [itex]|\phi\rangle[/itex] to [itex]\big(|\psi\rangle,|\phi\rangle\big)[/itex]. (Here I'm using the [itex](\cdot,\cdot)[/itex] notation for the inner product of two kets, to make things more readable). Now we can prove it like this:
[tex]\langle\psi|\phi\rangle^* =\big(\langle\psi|\big(|\phi\rangle\big)\big)^* =\big(|\psi\rangle,|\phi\rangle\big)^* =\big(|\phi\rangle,|\psi\rangle\big) =\langle\phi|\big(|\psi\rangle\big) =\langle\phi|\psi\rangle[/tex] The equality in the middle is the same identity that vanhees71 mentioned. As he said, it's part of the definition of an inner product.