Affine Algebraic Sets - D&F Chapter 15, Section 15.1 - Example 3 - pag

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Section Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Example 3 from Chapter 15 of "Abstract Algebra" by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote, specifically addressing the affine algebraic set defined by \( V = \mathcal{Z}(x^3 - y^2) \) in \( \mathbb{A}^2 \). The key point is the expression of any polynomial \( f(x,y) \in k[x,y] \) as \( f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y) \). The reasoning is clarified through induction on the degree of \( y \), demonstrating that the polynomial can be decomposed appropriately. This understanding is crucial for progressing in algebraic geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noetherian rings
  • Familiarity with affine algebraic sets
  • Knowledge of polynomial rings, specifically \( k[x,y] \)
  • Induction principles in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Noetherian rings in detail
  • Explore the concept of affine varieties and their geometric interpretations
  • Learn about polynomial decomposition techniques in algebraic geometry
  • Investigate the role of induction in algebraic proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraic geometers, and students studying commutative algebra who are looking to deepen their understanding of affine algebraic sets and polynomial expressions.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote Ch 15, Commutative Rings and Algebraic Geometry. In Section 15.1 Noetherian Rings and Affine Algebraic Sets, Example 3 on page 660 reads as follows: (see attachment)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let V = \mathcal{Z}(x^3 - y^2) in \ \ \mathbb{A}^2.

If (a, b) \in \mathbb{A}^2 is an element of V, then a^3 = b^2.

If a \ne 0, then also b \ne 0 and we can writea = (b/a)^2, \ b = (b/a)^3.

It follows that V is the set \{ (a^2, a^3) \ | \ a \in k \}.

For any polynomial f(x,y) \in k[x,y]. we can write f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y)

... ... ... etc etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cannot follow the line of reasoning:

"For any polynomial f(x,y) \in k[x,y]. we can write f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y)"

Can anyone clarify why this is true and why D&F are taking this step?

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It suffices to prove this for ##f(x,y) = x^n y^m##.

We prove it by induction on ##m##:
For ##m=0##, take ##f_0(x) = x^n## and the rest ##0##.
For ##m=1##, take ##f_1(x) = x^n## and the rest ##0##.

If it holds for ##m<m^\prime##, then write ##x^n y^m = - x^ny^{m-2} (x^3 - y^2 ) - x^{n+3}y^{m-2}##.
By induction, express ##x^{n+3}y^{m-2}## in the required form, then you can also express ##x^n y^m## in such form.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you so much for your help with this problem

I had nearly given up on it, and with it my progress into algebraic geometry!

So thanks again!

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K