Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,920
- 48
I am reading Dummit and Foote Ch 15, Commutative Rings and Algebraic Geometry. In Section 15.1 Noetherian Rings and Affine Algebraic Sets, Example 3 on page 660 reads as follows: (see attachment)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let V = \mathcal{Z}(x^3 - y^2) in \ \ \mathbb{A}^2.
If (a, b) \in \mathbb{A}^2 is an element of V, then a^3 = b^2.
If a \ne 0, then also b \ne 0 and we can writea = (b/a)^2, \ b = (b/a)^3.
It follows that V is the set \{ (a^2, a^3) \ | \ a \in k \}.
For any polynomial f(x,y) \in k[x,y]. we can write f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y)
... ... ... etc etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I cannot follow the line of reasoning:
"For any polynomial f(x,y) \in k[x,y]. we can write f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y)"
Can anyone clarify why this is true and why D&F are taking this step?
Peter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let V = \mathcal{Z}(x^3 - y^2) in \ \ \mathbb{A}^2.
If (a, b) \in \mathbb{A}^2 is an element of V, then a^3 = b^2.
If a \ne 0, then also b \ne 0 and we can writea = (b/a)^2, \ b = (b/a)^3.
It follows that V is the set \{ (a^2, a^3) \ | \ a \in k \}.
For any polynomial f(x,y) \in k[x,y]. we can write f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y)
... ... ... etc etc
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I cannot follow the line of reasoning:
"For any polynomial f(x,y) \in k[x,y]. we can write f(x,y) = f_0(x) + f_1(x)y + (x^3 - y^2)g(x,y)"
Can anyone clarify why this is true and why D&F are taking this step?
Peter