Agree or Disagree? Analyzing Wave Amplitudes

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 731016
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitudes Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of wave amplitudes, specifically distinguishing between initial amplitude (denoted as A_i) of traveling waves and the resultant amplitude (A_f) of standing waves. The initial amplitude before constructive interference is A_i, while the resultant amplitude after interference is 2A_i. Participants confirm that the references to amplitude in the highlighted statements are indeed consistent, with A representing the initial amplitude and the resultant amplitude being 2A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics, specifically amplitude concepts.
  • Familiarity with terms like constructive interference and standing waves.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation used in physics, such as A_i and A_f.
  • Experience with analyzing wave behavior in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of constructive interference in wave theory.
  • Study the mathematical representation of standing waves and their amplitudes.
  • Explore the implications of amplitude changes in different wave types.
  • Learn about the relationship between wave amplitude and energy transfer in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics, as well as researchers analyzing wave behavior and amplitude interactions.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this,
1682629098130.png


The two statements highlighted do not seem to agree. I think the first statement highlighted is referring to A as initial amplitude (which we can denote ##A_i##) of the traveling waves before there constructive interference to form antinodes with an amplitude 2A and nodes of an amplitude 0. Where I think the second highlighted statement is referring to when A is the resultant amplitude of standing wave which we can denote ##A_f = 2A_i##.

Is my understanding please correct?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
The two statements highlighted do not seem to agree. I think the first statement highlighted is referring to A as initial amplitude (which we can denote ##A_i##) of the traveling waves before there constructive interference to form antinodes with an amplitude 2A and nodes of an amplitude 0. Where I think the second highlighted statement is referring to when A is the resultant amplitude of standing wave which we can denote ##A_f = 2A_i##.

Is my understanding please correct?

Many thanks!
I believe you are right. There is also the very first sentence of that extract, which also says ##\pm A##. I assume A is defined in some preceding text, so both the A references should be 2A.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
haruspex said:
I believe you are right. There is also the very first sentence of that extract, which also says ##\pm A##. I assume A is defined in some preceding text, so both the A references should be 2A.
Great, thank you for your help @haruspex!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K