AI Marketed To Students: "Hello easy A's!"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of AI tools by students, particularly in the context of academic assignments and ethical considerations. Participants share personal experiences, observations from educators, and reflections on the implications of AI in education.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express enthusiasm for AI tools, highlighting their affordability and potential to enhance academic performance.
  • Others raise concerns about the quality of AI-generated essays, citing experiences from educators who have stopped teaching due to dissatisfaction with such submissions.
  • One participant mentions their school's ethics policy, allowing AI use for research but emphasizing that it should not replace personal writing efforts.
  • There are suggestions that AI could evolve into more interactive tools that promote critical thinking, akin to the Socratic method.
  • Some participants reflect on the historical development of tools that enhance human capability, suggesting that AI could similarly improve knowledge and skills if used responsibly.
  • There are mixed feelings about the uniformity of AI-generated content, with one participant describing it as having a "creepy" quality, likening it to mass-produced products.
  • One participant dismisses an AI advertisement as spam, indicating skepticism about the marketing of AI tools to students.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; while some advocate for the benefits of AI in education, others express significant concerns about its impact on teaching and learning quality.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of responsible AI use, differing institutional policies, and unresolved questions about the long-term effects of AI on academic integrity and learning outcomes.

Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,835
Reaction score
3,088

Seen on Facebook. An ad for AI. "hello easy A's!"

Confession time: I was blowing my grocery cash on AI tools like ChatGPT Plus for assignments!
😭

Until I discovered i10x.ai through a study group and it flipped everything.
Get same $100+ AI powers for just $8/month!
Say goodbye to broke student life, hello easy A's!
📚

Budget-friendly solution for students & young pros
👉
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Computer science news on Phys.org
I was speaking to someone recently who is a professor in the social sciences. She has given up teaching and gone back to research only as she was fed up reading AI generated essays.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
Our school has an ethics policy in place for it. We can use AI for research but we must check its results.

We can use it to help us write better but not do our writing for us ala Grammarly.

On taking open book tests, we can only rely on our notes and cheatsheets to work out answers. No phones, tablets, or laptops. We are allowed to bring a calculator depending on the type of test.

Someday the calculator may evolve into an LLM device that has been trained in the subject matter by the student or one that can steer the student in the right direction without giving away the answer. Perhaps with a single question to trigger the student’s memory

I’ve read of experiments with LLMs in the elementary grades where the students interact with it but rather than answering their questions it responds with a question. It’s the Socratic method wrapped in modern technology.

When writing a program, we can use it to write the framework but we must complete the assignment with a working and tested piece of code.

Personally, I’ve used it to write processing sketches for code I’m developing. Processing’s easy access to the canvas and mouse and its display looping makes prototyping fun and easy.

Other times, its helped me to understand CUDA code in a C++ program or dense code in other languages.

So we must use AI responsibly and it can improve our knowledge and critical thinking skills.

Throughout history we have developed tools to see farther and farther (telescope…), to see smaller and smaller (microscope…), to compute faster and faster (abacus and sliderule…) and now to research deeper and deeper (web search —> LLM…).

We can either drown in our technology or rise above it to do ever greater things.

The choice is yours.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint and Astronuc
PeroK said:
I was speaking to someone recently who is a professor in the social sciences. She has given up teaching and gone back to research only as she was fed up reading AI generated essays.
Yes there is something subtly creepy about them. I can't put my finger on what it is. Maybe it's that they all seem to have been written by the same person. It's like Kraft cheese or something.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: symbolipoint
Klaatu barada nikto!
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
PeroK said:
I was speaking to someone recently who is a professor in the social sciences. She has given up teaching and gone back to research only as she was fed up reading AI generated essays.
She's fortunate to have such an option.
 
robphy said:
She's fortunate to have such an option.
She and her husband are not short of a bob or two!
 
Hornbein said:

Seen on Facebook. An ad for AI. "hello easy A's!"

That looks like AI-generated spam.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
69K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
31K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K