Albert Einstein's Wisdom: Reality vs Science

  • Thread starter Thread starter SpaceGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reality Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a quote attributed to Albert Einstein regarding the nature of science and its relationship to reality. Participants explore the implications of the quote, its philosophical underpinnings, and their personal reflections on science, knowledge, and the role of belief in scientific discourse.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express appreciation for Einstein's quote, suggesting it highlights the evolving nature of science and its reliance on reproducible evidence.
  • Others challenge the characterization of science as "childlike" or "primitive," questioning the negative connotations associated with these terms and arguing for the value of scientific inquiry.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of societal context in scientific advancement, suggesting that society, rather than science itself, is the most precious entity.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of invoking God in scientific discourse, with some participants expressing discomfort with religious references in the context of scientific reasoning.
  • Several participants share their favorite quotes from other scientists, such as Isaac Newton, and discuss the nuances of these quotes, including potential historical rivalries and interpretations.
  • One participant notes the limitations of scientific models, suggesting that while they are useful, they often fail to fully capture the complexities of reality.
  • Humor and skepticism are introduced with quotes from Niels Bohr and David Griffiths, reflecting a lighter take on the nature of scientific inquiry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions about the meaning and implications of Einstein's quote, with no clear consensus on whether science should be viewed as primitive or childlike. Disagreements arise regarding the role of belief in science and the appropriateness of religious references in scientific discussions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential for misunderstanding the terms "childlike" and "primitive," suggesting that these descriptors may not accurately reflect the value of scientific knowledge. The discussion also touches on the historical context of quotes shared, which may influence their interpretation.

SpaceGuy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
'One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have.'

Albert Einstein
(1879-1955)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nice quote
 
Very nice quote! It's true!
 
I had not heard that one before, but it rings true. My favorite is "God does not play dice."
 
This is a very nice quote. I find that it especially rings true when one considers arguments made against science. It is true that science is consitantly proven wrong and improved upon, making it seem somewhat child-like. However, it is this approach, one based on recreatable evidence, which is its strength. we can say that "This is to the best of our knowledge." This is the only approach to take, in my opinion. What else may we based our knowledge on?
 
'One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have.'
--rauketman

I disagree. Why is it childish ? What is so primitive about a child's mind ? Society is the most precious thing we have--- it allows for science among other things.

' I had not heard that one before, but it rings true. My favorite is "God does not play dice.'
--Fullhawking

Sorry, but this is my least favourite quote of all time ( along with his little finger telling him stuff---God talking to him in mysterious ways, perhaps ? )
Why mention God ? Did Einstein deduce this from experiment ? Can we replicate it ? Is it based on a logical theory ?
I stopped reading Stephen Hawking's A brief history of time when he started going on about 'knowing the mind of God'.
George LeMaitre, a priest, did not invoke religion when writing of his Primeval Atom theory, and kept it in a proper scientific context.
He did not allow his devout religious views to reduce the scientific integrity of his conclusions.
When someone mentions belief-based views, I start wondering about scientific integrity being upheld. Just because Einstein was clever, and put forward mind-blowing special and general relativity, it does not mean we should hang on his every word ( cosmological constant, anyone ? ).
Of course, we must use word 'believe' sometimes for tentative ideas, but 'believe' as in 'religion' is simply not scientific.
 
I disagree. Why is it childish ? What is so primitive about a child's mind ? Society is the most precious thing we have--- it allows for science among other things.
-- Tom D

Well, first thing I've to point out is that childlike and childish have similar meanings, much very different connotations. Obviously, the second one is rather negative, but definitely not the first.

Personally, I wouldn't really say that our science is primative or childlike, but I do agree that it is the most precious thing we have. If we do not have any scientific knowledge, defined as knowledge of our world, we humans would not have survived.

I also don't really like the one from Einstein, but it's better than some others I've heard.
 
'If I have seen further than other men, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.'

- Isaac Newton

This quote is my favourite, as it encapsulates the sheer monument of what science is, the culmulative intellectual acheivement of thousands, if not, millions of the most brilliant minds of the last four centuries.
 
Originally posted by Claude Bile
'If I have seen further than other men, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.'

- Isaac Newton

This quote is my favourite, as it encapsulates the sheer monument of what science is, the culmulative intellectual acheivement of thousands, if not, millions of the most brilliant minds of the last four centuries.

Yes, Claude, I like that one too. Not self-depreciating, yet acknowledging efforts of others.
Considering Newton's reputation, I think this shows a bit of humility, which is a great quality.
 
  • #10
i know this is years late...but many say Newton's quote is really an insult to hooke who was so short...there was plenty of animosity between the two
 
  • #11
Yes, I've heard that was exactly the point of the Newton quote: a double entendre.
 
  • #12
Not physics related quote, but here's my favourite.

If you talk to God you are praying, if God talks to you, you have paranoid Schizophrenia.
 
  • #13
SpaceGuy said:
'One thing I have learned in a long life: that all our science, measured against reality, is primitive and childlike - and yet it is the most precious thing we have.'
Albert Einstein
(1879-1955)

Tom D said:
I disagree. Why is it childish ? What is so primitive about a child's mind ? ...
I believe the point was that, especially for those who daily use even the most sophisticated tools of modern science in the investigation of the natural world, you find time after time those tools are remarkable primitive in their ability to describe reality. The models, while extremely useful, are just so crude when one observes closely what's out there. We have this vast universe of trillions upon trillions out there, and yet the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_body_problem#Three-body_problem" is still beyond the power of science.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
russ_watters said:
Yes, I've heard that was exactly the point of the Newton quote: a double entendre.

Yes, it was definitely meant as an insult to Hook who was a hunchback. Newton took every opportunity to insult Hook and this quote is no exception. There is a short discussion about this in James Gleick's biography of Newton.
The bottom line is that Newton was a great scientist but not a nice man.
 
  • #15
I like this one, also by Newton:

Newton said:
I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the sea-shore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me.

Similar in some ways to the OP's quote.
 
  • #16
Tom D said:
What is so primitive about a child's mind ?
Take out the negative emotive connotations and you'll see that 'primitive' is a descriptive term for a child's mind. Similarly, Early Man was primitive, but had huge potential; it took time and experience to make good on that potential.
 
  • #17
Fullhawking said:
I had not heard that one before, but it rings true. My favorite is "God does not play dice."

I prefer Bohr's reply.

"Stop telling God what to do with his dice".

And some more of his quotes:

"We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough."

"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made in a very narrow field."

"Science is but one death after another."

Niels Bohr
 
Last edited:
  • #18
"When you hear a physicist invoke the uncertainty principle, keep a hand on your wallet."

David Griffiths
 
  • #19
"You are not even wrong."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
410
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K