Algebraic Topology via Categories

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the search for modern textbooks on algebraic topology that are developed within a purely categorical framework. Participants explore various recommendations and express their experiences with different texts, focusing on both content and pedagogical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about modern books on algebraic topology that utilize a purely categorical framework, mentioning Eilenberg and Steenrod as a potential resource.
  • Another participant suggests Spanier's textbook as being somewhat categorical but warns that it is terse and difficult to read, sharing their own experience of stopping after the first chapter.
  • A different participant questions the meaning of "purely" categorical and points to Peter May's modern book, which incorporates category theoretic language.
  • One participant expresses enthusiasm for May's book and suggests that it provides a comprehensive introduction and further reading guide, while also emphasizing the categorical nature of algebraic topology.
  • A participant acknowledges the return of another contributor, expressing appreciation for their presence in the discussion.
  • Another participant advises that the initial chapter of Spanier's book may be the most challenging, suggesting that subsequent chapters could be more accessible.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the availability of modern categorical textbooks in algebraic topology, with multiple competing views on what constitutes a purely categorical approach and varying experiences with recommended texts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the definitions and scope of "purely" categorical frameworks in algebraic topology, and there are indications that different levels of understanding and familiarity with the subject may affect the interpretation of recommendations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals seeking modern resources in algebraic topology, particularly those interested in categorical approaches, as well as those navigating the challenges of existing textbooks.

Reedeegi
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know of a modern book on algebriac topology developed in a purely categorical framework? I've been recommended Eilenberg and Steenrod (which I may end up getting regardless), but I'm looking for more recent developments in both material and pedagogy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure if there any modern textbooks which are purely categorical, but I guess Spanier's textbook is as close as it comes of being categorical in nature.

But be warned it's tersier than any other textbook in the field.
I stopped reading after the first chapter, some of it because I didn't have time to do the exercises and really assimilate the material.
 
I don't know what you mean by a "purely" categorical framework. But Peter May has written a modern book with lot of category theoretic language: click (pdf).
 
well this frustrating browser just erased my post.

basically i said May's free! book looks great, and thanks to Landau.

I suggest reading May's introduction and his guide to further reading, and then you will have an expert's answer to essentially your question, and much more.

also i recommended starting by learning the fundamental group, if you are a beginner.

The reason people are puzzled by your question as posed is that algebraic topology is by definition a study of functors from topology to algebra, so almost any treatment falls under this heading, except maybe a really old one like Hocking and Young.

I.e. essentially any treatment that constructs an algebraic object out of a topological space and then immediately also constructs the induced algebraic homomorphism coming from a continuous map of the top. spaces, and checks that compositions go to compositions, and identities go to identities, hence necessarily isomorphisms go to isomorphisms, is taking a categorical approach.

But maybe you are way beyond this and interested in spectra, cohomology operations, axiomatic homotopy, derived categories, and so on. Anyway, May discusses everything from the perspective of an expert.
 
Last edited:
Wow, mathwonk is back. That's great, even if it's only for a while!
 
to the physicist who quit reading spanier after chapter one, let me suggest that chapter one may be the most terse and unreadable chapter, and that chapters 2,3,4 may be much better and easier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
12K