Aligning a matrix with its eigen vectors and other questions?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the alignment of a square symmetrical matrix with its eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as well as transformations to achieve specific properties such as a trace of 1. Participants explore the implications of these transformations and the terminology used in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a symmetrical matrix and its eigenvalues, questioning the correctness of aligning the matrix with its eigenvectors.
  • Another participant clarifies that "aligned with its eigenvectors" is not standard terminology but suggests that the proposed alignment is conceptually correct.
  • The second participant explains how a linear transformation can be represented using a specific ordered basis and how eigenvalues relate to this representation.
  • It is proposed that to transform the matrix such that its diagonal elements equal 1, one must divide each eigenvector by its corresponding eigenvalue.
  • A later reply inquires about scaling the transformed matrix to achieve a trace of 1.
  • The original poster later resolves their query by stating that dividing the aligned matrix by its trace achieves the desired property.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of aligning the matrix with its eigenvalues and the subsequent transformation steps, though there is no explicit consensus on the terminology used. The discussion remains open regarding the implications of these transformations.

Contextual Notes

Terminology such as "aligned with its eigenvectors" is not standard, and the discussion includes various assumptions about linear transformations and matrix representations that may not be universally accepted.

Dr Bwts
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a square symmetrical matrix A (ugly I know)


321.1115, -57.5311, -33.9206
-57.5311, 296.7836, 10.8958
-33.9206, 10.8958, 382.1050

which has the eigen values,

248.8034
341.6551
409.5415

Am I right in saying that A when aligned with its eigen vectors it is,

248.8034, 0, 0
0, 341.6551, 0
0, 0, 409.5415

?

I would also like to transform the matrix so that,

A11+A22+A33 = 1

Thanks for any help, I feel like I should know this but have been running around in circles for the past 2 hours.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"aligned with its eigenvectors" is not standard terminology, but I think what you mean is correct. Given any linear transformation, T, from a vector space of dimension n to itself, we can always represent the transformation as a vector space by using a specific ordered basis for the vector space. The idea is that we apply T to each of the basis vectors in turn, writing the result as a linear combination of the basis vectors. For example, if we have a three dimensional vector space with ordered basis \{v_1, v_2, v_3\} then the vector x_1v_2+ x_2v_2+ x_3v_3 would be represented by the array
\begin{bmatrix}x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3\end{bmatrix}
In particular, v_1= 1v_1+ 0v_2+ 0v_3 itself is represented by
\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}

So if T(v_1)= a_1v_1+ a_2v_2_+ a_3v_3 we can write
\begin{a_1 & * & * \\ a_2 & * & * \\ a_3 & * & * \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \\ 0\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}a_1 \\ a_2\\ a_3\end{bmatrix}
where the "*" in the second and third columns can be anything.

That is, the result result of T applied to basis vector v_i gives the ith column of the matrix representation. In particular, if the basis vectors are eigenvalues of T, then Tv_1= \lamba_1 v_1+ 0 v_2+ 0v_3, Tv_2= 0v_1+ \lambda_2v_2+ 0v_3, and Tv_3= 0v_1+ 0v_2+ \lambda_3v_3 so the matrix representation, in that basis, is
\begin{bmatrix}\lambda_2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda_3\end{bmatrix}

To reduce those diagonal elements to 1 is to divide each eigenvector by the corresponding eigenvalue. If v_1 is an eigenvector of T with eigenvalue \lambda_1 then
T\frac{v_1}{\lambda_1}= \frac{1}{\lambda_1}Tv_1= \frac{1}{\lambda_1}\lambda_1 v_1= v_1
so representing T as as matrix by using basis vectors v_1/\lambda_1, v_2/\lambda_2, and v_3/\lambda_3 will give the identity matrix.
 
Thanks for the reply.

Once the matrix (A) has been transformed as above how can I scale it such that,

trace(A)=1

?
 
Last edited:
OK panic over I just divide the aligned matrix by its trace.

Thanks for your time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K