Transform a 2x2 matrix into an anti-symmetric matrix

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dRic2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Transform
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Hi,
I have a 2x2 hermitian matrix like:
$$
A = \begin{bmatrix}
a && b \\
-b && -a
\end{bmatrix}
$$
(b is imaginary to ensure that it is hermitian). I would like to find an orthogonal transformation M that makes A skew-symmetric:
$$
\hat A = \begin{bmatrix}
0 && c \\
-c && 0
\end{bmatrix}
$$
Is it possible, or I need to constrain my problem more? I need M to be orthogonal and with det(M) = 1. I was thinking maybe there are some tricks involving Pauli matrices.Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is possible since the minimal polynomials of [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]\hat A[/itex] are [itex]m_A(\lambda) = \lambda^2 + b^2 - a^2[/itex] and [itex]m_{\hat A}(\lambda) = \lambda^2 + c^2[/itex], so if [itex]c^2 = b^2 - a^2[/itex] they will have the same minimal polynomial and the same Jordan normal form (which in this case is diagonal).

However, I don't think [itex]M[/itex] will be orthogonal unless the eigenvectors of [itex]A[/itex] are orthogonal, which does not appear to be the case in general: the eigenvectors are [itex](b, a \mp \lambda)[/itex] and their inner product is [tex]|a|^2 + |b|^2 + 2\operatorname{Im}(a\bar{\lambda}) - |\lambda|^2[/tex] where [itex]\lambda^2 = a^2 - b^2[/itex].
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark, PeroK and dRic2
Question: since A is hermitian ##\lambda## are reals, so if ##a## is real, then ##\text{Im}(a\lambda) = 0##
and
$$
|a|^2 - |b|^2 - (a^2 - b^2) = |b|^2 + b^2 = 0
$$
because ##b## is purely imaginary. Right?
 
No, you have ##|b|^2## with the wrong sign on the left.
 
Maarten Havinga said:
No, you have ##|b|^2## with the wrong sign on the left.
Sorry it was a typo. It should read ##+|b|^2## and it should be correct.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Maarten Havinga
It is correct with that addition
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2