Alternative form of geodesic equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an alternative form of the geodesic equation in the context of general relativity. The original poster is tasked with demonstrating a specific equation involving the second derivative of coordinates with respect to proper time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to substitute a relation involving the metric tensor into the geodesic equation but expresses confusion about the differentiation of the components. They question whether the metric should be factored out of the derivative.
  • Another participant clarifies the distinction between covariant and contravariant components, suggesting that the original poster's understanding of lowering indices may need adjustment.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing clarifications on the mathematical relationships involved. There is no explicit consensus yet, but guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of indices and differentiation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of general coordinates and the implications of using the metric tensor in their calculations. There is an acknowledgment of potential misunderstandings regarding the properties of vectors and their components.

rohanlol7
Messages
66
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


We are asked to show that:
## \frac{d^2x_\mu}{d\tau^2}= \frac{1}{2} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^{\rho}}{d\tau} \frac{\partial g_{\rho \nu}}{\partial x^{\mu}} ##
( please ignore the image in this section i cannot remove it for some reason )
ePzGn22

Homework Equations


crO0kSQ

HRn8Qoc

htyuQp6.png

VoQnGIs.png

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]I have tried substituting ## x_\mu = g_{a\mu} x^{a} ## in the geodesic equation, but all that i end up with is a complete mess.
Maybe I am understanding it all wrong, for instance i think that ## \frac{dx_\mu}{d\tau} = \frac{ d g_{a\mu} x^{a}}{d\tau}##, Is this correct or is the ##g_{a\mu}## supposed to go outside of the derivative ?
 

Attachments

  • htyuQp6.png
    htyuQp6.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 886
  • VoQnGIs.png
    VoQnGIs.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 844
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot put images in your posts like that. Please upload the relevant images.
 
Orodruin said:
You cannot put images in your posts like that. Please upload the relevant images.
I have added the images properly now
 
rohanlol7 said:
I have tried substituting ## x_\mu = g_{a\mu} x^{a} ## in the geodesic equation, but all that i end up with is a complete mess.
Maybe I am understanding it all wrong, for instance i think that ## \frac{dx_\mu}{d\tau} = \frac{ d g_{a\mu} x^{a}}{d\tau}##, Is this correct or is the ##g_{a\mu}## supposed to go outside of the derivative ?
For general coordinates, ##x^{\mu}##, it is not true that ## x_\mu = g_{\mu \alpha } x^{\alpha} ##. The ##x^{\mu}## are not components of a contravariant vector. So, it doesn't make sense to lower the index using the expression ## x_\mu = g_{\mu \alpha} x^{\alpha} ##.

However, the differentials ##dx^{\mu}## are the components of a contravariant vector. So, you can lower the index on these according to ## dx_\mu = g_{\mu \alpha} dx^{\alpha} ## to make a covariant vector. Likewise, you can write ## \frac{dx_\mu}{d \tau} = g_{\mu \alpha} \frac{dx^{\alpha}}{d \tau} ##.

Apply this to ##\frac{d^2 x_{\mu}}{d \tau^2}## by writing ##\frac{d^2 x_{\mu}}{d \tau^2} = \frac{d}{d \tau} \left( \frac{dx_\mu}{d \tau} \right) ##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rohanlol7

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K