Alternative to a square linear bearing?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding an alternative to the expensive 7mm Drylin square linear bearing for a 3D printer application, ideally for a smaller 3mm shaft. The user explores the possibility of creating a new extruder design that uses a remote stepper motor and a third rail mechanism to transmit motion. They consider using a 7.5mm Drylin bearing, acknowledging its torque capacity but noting the challenges of necessary gearing that could increase torque on the bearing. Concerns about dynamic flexing and backlash in the system are raised, particularly regarding the trade-offs between different 3D printing configurations. The conversation highlights the complexity of balancing design requirements with component limitations in 3D printing systems.
CWatters
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
10,546
Reaction score
2,324
Anyone know of an alternative to the 7mm Drylin square linear bearing? They seem on the expensive side, 30GBP for just the plastic insert/bearing surface.

https://www.igus.co.uk/product/983

Ideally I'm looking for something smaller, say for a 3mm shaft/rail?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Without any information on your application requirements it is difficult to make any rational suggestions.
 
Its for a 3D printer. Most cheap 3D printers are one of two types : "Direct" (where the extruder and it's stepper motor are mounted on the carriage) and "Bowden cable" (where the extruder and stepper are remote and connected to the carriage by a flexible pipe that carries the filament). Both have advantage and disadvantages.

I thought it might be possible to make a third type that has the extruder on the carriage but a remote stepper motor.

I initially thought about using a flexible drive shaft but then it occurred to me I could mount the stepper at one end of the linear rails that the carriage rides on and add a "third rail" that was rotated by it. So I would need something like the Drylin bearing on the carriage that could slide on the third rail but would be rotate by it and transmit motion to the extruder in the carriage.

The extruder stepper is typically a size 17 stepper motor which turns a gear in the extruder at low rpm (say 100rpm?) with a torque of less than 40Ncm (0.4Nm).

I might be able to use the 7.5mm version of the Square Drylin bearing as it's well within its torque specs. However the bearing itself is about 15mm in diameter and would need a ring gear around it to drive the extruder gear. This would mean an unavoidable step up gearing because the ring gear would be bigger than the extruder gear. This step up increase the torque on the linear bearing.

Sorry if that's hard to follow, I'll try and post a sketch tomorrow.
 
Last edited:
Will dropping the diameter thus allow excessive dynamic flexing / 'whipping', or is that handled elsewhere ?
 
That's a possible problem but other types of system such as the Bowden cable type also have a lot of backlash between extruder and print head so some flex in the drive might still be acceptable.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
554
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K