Alternative to the big bang [new scientist]

In summary, the author found this article today and found it to be of interest. However, they do not agree with the author's view that the inflationary model with graceful exit is the only explanation for inflation. They feel that there is a lack of a fundamental physical explanation for inflation, and instead believe that it is a religion.
  • #1
matthyaouw
Gold Member
1,125
5
I found this article today. Makes my head hurt but I'm sure it will be of interest.
(subscription required, so I'm not sure whether I would be allowed to post an extract)

http://space.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19526204.000&feedId=online-news_rss20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not sure Germani's "heresy" is all that interesting in light of Reuter's explanation of inflation with graceful exit in a way that does not require an inflaton field.
Could be that Germani is just tilting at last years windmills.

However the New Scientist "pay-per-view" is no big obstacle. Anyone who is interested can read Germani's papers about his "SLINGSHOT COSMOLOGY" for free on arxiv

http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0023
The Cosmological Slingshot Scenario: Myths and Facts
Authors: Cristiano Germani (SISSA and INFN), Nicolas Grandi (La Plata, Inst. Natl. Phys.), Alex Kehagias (Natl. Tech. U., Athens)
(Submitted on 1 Jun 2007 (v1), last revised 4 Jun 2007 (this version, v2))

Abstract: In this paper we clarify two important issues regarding the Cosmological Slingshot Scenario, namely the choice of frame and the creation of primordial fluctuations. In particular, we show that the Einstein frame represents a non-trivial bouncing cosmology. Regarding the calculation of the primordial perturbations, we identify their vacuum state and elucidate their evolution from the quantum to the classical regimes. Finally, we calculate the exact power spectrum of primordial perturbations showing its compatibility with current data.

Comments: 14 pages, 1 figures;

http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0025
Matching WMAP 3-yrs results with the Cosmological Slingshot Primordial Spectrum
Authors: Cristiano Germani (SISSA), Michele Liguori (DAMTP)
(Submitted on 1 Jun 2007)

Abstract: We show that the Slingshot primordial spectrum of scalar perturbations agrees, with high level of accuracy, with the WMAP three-years data. In its general form, the Slingshot power spectrum naturally contains an infrared cut-off. If this infrared cut-off is outside the WMAP window, the agreement with data can be found by fixing only two parameters, the spectral index and the normalization of the power spectrum, at any fixed high multipole (l>10). Conversely, if the infrared cut-off is within the WMAP window, the power spectrum of temperature fluctuations can be slightly bluer at low multipoles (l<10).

Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures
============================

I haven't looked at these so I can't either recommend or DIScommend them. May turn out to be of interest---just can't tell.

thanks to Matt for calling attention to them.
 
  • #3
'New Scientist' weaves fact with fantasy too often for my comfort level. I find myself spending more time validating their 'facts' than reading the articles. It's a constructive, albeit frustrating exercise. It's sort of like the 'Jerry Springer' of pop science.
 
  • #4
Ick, I read the article up until this gem:

"We don't have any fundamental physical explanation for how or why it occurred," he says. "Yet cosmologists today accept it as though it is a religion."

I can't even begin to describe the confusion of ideas that leads to this kind of view!
 
  • #5
Wallace said:
Ick, I read the article up until this gem:

"We don't have any fundamental physical explanation for how or why it occurred," he says. "Yet cosmologists today accept it as though it is a religion."

I can't even begin to describe the confusion of ideas that leads to this kind of view!

I gather you read a bit of the New Scientist article. I didn't look at it because it tends to work better for me if I totally avoid reading NewSci as long as I can find the REAL articles on arxiv.org or in some other more solid journal.

thanks for posting your reaction. Maybe we can just ignore Germani's speculative stuff?
Has anyone looked at Germani's actual papers about Slingshot Cosmology that are on arxiv?
 
  • #6
hey man don't worry Big Bang is the true model of the beginning of the universe. I believe that the creator of this whole universe which i call"Discoveror of Nature" had must follow the Big Bangmodel to create this elegant, beautiful,unimaginably complex despite of its beauty cosmos. Big Bang is as sure as Earth goes round the sun.
 

1) What is the alternative to the big bang theory?

The most commonly proposed alternative to the big bang theory is the steady state theory, which suggests that the universe has always existed and is constantly expanding but does not have a definitive beginning or end.

2) What evidence supports the alternative theory?

Some of the evidence used to support the steady state theory includes the fact that the universe appears to be uniform and unchanging on a large scale, as well as the observation of distant galaxies that seem to be younger than they should be according to the big bang theory.

3) How does the alternative theory explain the origin of the universe?

The steady state theory proposes that the universe has always existed and is constantly expanding. This means that there was no specific beginning to the universe, and it has always been in a state of expansion.

4) Is the alternative theory widely accepted in the scientific community?

No, the steady state theory is not widely accepted in the scientific community. The big bang theory is currently the most widely accepted and supported explanation for the origin of the universe.

5) Are there any other alternative theories to the big bang?

There are other alternative theories to the big bang, such as the oscillating universe theory and the multiverse theory. However, these theories also have their own limitations and are not as widely accepted as the big bang theory.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
917
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top