Alternative to Von Neumann bias correction method

tim1608
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have discovered that the Von Neumann bias correction method only works when the bias is 100% stable, for example tossing the same loaded coin again and again.

Does anyone know of a bias correction method which can correct an unstable bias? Is this impossible?

Edit: Let's say I have a bucket of coins, each of which is differently loaded but they are all loaded on the tails side. How can the bias be removed if the coins are each tossed one-by-one?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
tim1608 said:
if the coins are each tossed one-by-one?

Are you going to label the coins and toss them in order till all are tossed and then toss them again in the same order?
 
Hi Stephen

Thank you for your reply.

No. The hypothetical "bucket" in my original post has an infinite number of coins.
 
To pose an interesting problem, I think you must say more about the population of coins and how they are selected. (For example, you haven't ruled out an infinite population of two-headed coins.)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top