Ambipolar diffusion and sheaths in a bounded plasma

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between ambipolar diffusion and sheath formation in bounded plasma. The congruence assumption states that ion and electron fluxes must be equal in a quasi-neutral plasma at steady state, represented by the equation $$\Gamma_i = \Gamma_e$$. However, due to the higher mobility of electrons, they diffuse out of the plasma more quickly than ions, leading to a negatively charged boundary and the formation of a positive sheath. This transient phenomenon does not conflict with ambipolar diffusion, as the quasi-neutrality condition is violated within the sheath, allowing for an equilibrium to establish between the sheath region and the ambipolar diffusion region.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plasma physics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with the concepts of ambipolar diffusion
  • Knowledge of ion and electron flux equations
  • Concept of quasi-neutrality in plasma systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the ambipolar diffusion equation in plasma physics
  • Research the dynamics of sheath formation in bounded plasma
  • Explore the implications of transient phenomena on plasma behavior
  • Examine the role of electron mobility in plasma stability and flux dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in plasma physics, physicists studying charged particle dynamics, and engineers working with plasma applications will benefit from this discussion.

Decimal
Messages
73
Reaction score
7
Hello,

I am currently working through an introductory textbook on plasma physics, and I have encountered two topics that I separately understand but seem to be at odds with one another. In a quasi neutral plasma in steady state, the following relation must hold, $$\Gamma_i = \Gamma_e.$$ In other words, the ion and electron flux must be equal. My textbook refers to this as the congruence assumption, which can be derived from the continuity equations for both ions and electrons. By using this assumption one can derive the equation for ambipolar diffusion, which ensures that this condition is always fulfilled.

In the next chapter however, it is explained that due to higher mobility of electrons they will tend to diffuse out of the plasma much more quickly than ions. Thus in this case $$\Gamma_i << \Gamma_e.$$This will cause any boundary of the plasma to become negatively charged, which leads to the formation of a positive sheath. This in isolation seems logical to me. However how does it not conflict with the statement made before about ambipolar diffusion?

If ambipolar diffusion in a plasma ensures that the two fluxes are always equal, then how can a sheath ever form. I realize that the quasi neutrality condition is violated inside the sheath, so here the congruence assumption no longer holds. This however still doesn't explain to me how the sheath could ever form in the first place.

It would be really helpful if someone could explain how these two concepts relate.

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
The first case is "a quasi neutral plasma in steady state".
The second case is a transient phenomenon. Note the words "due to higher mobility of electrons they will tend to diffuse out of the plasma much more quickly than ions". This is clearly not a system in steady state.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Decimal
tnich said:
The first case is "a quasi neutral plasma in steady state".
The second case is a transient phenomenon. Note the words "due to higher mobility of electrons they will tend to diffuse out of the plasma much more quickly than ions". This is clearly not a system in steady state.

Thanks for the response, that makes a lot of sense! Would it then be correct to say that in steady state an equilibrium builds up between the sheath region and the ambipolar diffusion region, where both phenomena ensure flux equality across the entire plasma? (Except for inside the sheath of course).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K