Imagine attaching electrodes to a complex sample, e.g. a semi-conductor or a single chemical molecule, leading to some electric current.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Can we decompose this electron flow into local flows?- like locally attaching amperometer and counting what fraction of electrons flow directly between given two atoms, or some larger parts of the system,like while analyzing electric circuits. In other words, can weimagine electron current as diffusion driven by electric field?- like explained in basic education.

While the above seems natural and intuitive, it was basically given up a half a century ago due to problems with modelling semiconductors. The issue is thatstandard diffusion models lead to to nearly uniform stationary probability distribution. Hence, attaching electric field we would get electron flow -wrongly predicting that semiconductor is a conductor.

In contrast, quantum mechanics predicts stronglylocalized (Anderson)probability distribution,prisoning the electrons and preventing conductance. Here are examples of electron density graphs for surface of semiconductor from 2010 Science article (its slides) using tunneling microscope (STM) - having complex localized patterns:

This disagreement enforced the quantum view: with interfering waves of electrons.

However, it turns out that standard diffusion models often only approximate the(Jaynes) principle of maximum entropy: "the probability distribution which best represents the current state of knowledge is the one with largest entropy", required by statistical physics models. This approximation is repaired inMaximal Entropy Random Walk (MERW), which turns out to have the missing localization property (PRL article) - leads to stationary probability distribution exactly as predicted by QM: of quantum ground state.

Here is example of evolution of standard random walk (GRW) and MERW on 40x40 lattice with cyclic boundary conditions, which is defected: all but marked vertices (squares) have additional self-loop (degree is 4 or 5):

So MERW can be seen as some "quantum correction to diffusion models", e.g. here is a simple semiconductor simulator. However, it is not QM, it completely ignores interference-like phenomena. Butwhile complete quantum conductance calculations are usually too expensive for our computers, MERW-based diffusion is relatively accessible, still having some crucial quantum properties- the question is importance of interference this approximation neglects.

So can we ask about local electron flows in complex conductance situations?E.g. through aromatic ring of a molecule? Through graphene?

How important is interference in electron conductance?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Interference in electron conductance through e.g. molecule?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Interference electron conductance | Date |
---|---|

B Electrons interfere with eachother? | Apr 12, 2017 |

B Two-Slit Experiment And Varying Electron Momentum | May 12, 2016 |

B Interference patterns of electrons vs. photons | Mar 17, 2016 |

Interference of two independent electron beams? | Nov 2, 2012 |

Single Electron D-slit Interference Experiment | May 10, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**